Re: Yet another attempt at getting this darned sig to verify for
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > WebserverTalk Community > Anonymous Servers > Re: Yet another attempt at getting this darned sig to verify for




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Re: Yet another attempt at getting this darned sig to verify for  
John Doe


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-18-07 06:12 PM


OpenPGP Security Info

Error - signature verification failed

Indented message part (reply) was probably modified

gpg command line and output:
 Z:\\PortTB\\ThunderbirdPortable\\App\\gp
g\\gpg.exe --charset utf8
--batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 -d
gpg: Signature made 09/17/07 23:12:00 using RSA key ID 14A606A7
gpg: BAD signature from "Doctor Who <doctor_who@nym.alias.net>"

the whole concept is NILL, who is actually gobernment sponsored ghost
writer team, whose sigs sometimes work sometimes not.



Nomen Nescio wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Doctor Who wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:00:15 GMT, Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote
:
>
> <snipped>
>
> Interesting.  When I attempted to send using ascii within the body of the 
message,
> my usual way in non-binary groups, Agent came back with a warning that if 
I
> continued to post (using ascii) some characters could not be sent as shown
, but
> as "?".  It offered me the usual (default) windows compatible ISO 8859-1.
>
> This might explain some of the problems.   Agent is set up to allow an att
achment
> (non-binary and non-zip) to be wrapped within the body of the message.  Pr
esumably
> this is why it has the non-standard default settings for the encoding and 
char sets.
>
> If I have caused anyone any offence because if this, I most humbly apologi
ze.   I
> 
> 
>
>
> humbly retract all/any insults I may have offered or traded as a result of
 this mistake
> (on my part, I hasten to add).   I should have known about this.   I did n
ot.  I simply
> accepted Agent's default settings without question.   It is my fault entir
ely.
>
> Of course, my sig may still check out as "bad".   If so, I am at a total l
oss.
> 
>
> Doctor Who
> 





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register