Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager.  I have talked
to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace
a call.  Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not.   Any
ideas?

 

Katherine O. Dupree

Randolph College

Main 243

Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator

kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <mailto:kdupree@rmwc.edu> 

(434) 947 8371

 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I'm not sure if it's included in the default dial plan if using the @
wildcard.  If not, you'd need to set up a specific route pattern for *69
that forwards those digits out a specific port.

Another thing to consider is whether the telco will accept *69 off of a
digital circuit.  I know here we are only able to get the telco to
recognize *67 (caller ID block) on analog lines.

-matt

Kathy Dupree wrote:
> Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager.  I have talked
> to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace
> a call.  Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not.   Any ideas?
>
>
>
> *Katherine O. Dupree*
>
> *Randolph College***
>
> *Main 243*
>
> *Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator*
>
> *kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <mailto:kdupree@rmwc.edu>*
>
> *(434) 947 8371*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

problem with this is you might not be getting the right channel on your
PRI.  therefore the*69 might work but no gaurentee its the right call your
getting.

Scott


On 9/19/07, Kathy Dupree <KDupree@randolphcollege.edu> wrote:
>
>  Is there a way to make *69 or *59 work with call Manager.  I have talked
> to my local provider and it seems I need a court order for them to trace a
> call.  Someone asked if *69 or *59 worked and it does not.   Any ideas?
>
>
>
> *Katherine O. Dupree*
>
> *Randolph College***
>
> *Main 243*
>
> *Telecommunications Support/Infrastructure Coordinator*
>
> *kdupree@randolphcollege.edu <kdupree@rmwc.edu>*
>
> *(434) 947 8371*
>
>
>
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Kathy,

Maybe in the future if you are intereseted or find the need for it, you can look into t
his companies products http://www.securelogix.com

---- Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> problem with this is you might not be getting the right channel on your
> PRI.  therefore the*69 might work but no gaurentee its the right call your
> getting.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 9/19/07, Kathy Dupree <KDupree@randolphcollege.edu> wrote: 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]