[jira] Commented: (JDO-529) ChangeQuery - DISTINCT is expected even
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Apache Server configuration support > Apache JDO Project > [jira] Commented: (JDO-529) ChangeQuery - DISTINCT is expected even




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    [jira] Commented: (JDO-529) ChangeQuery - DISTINCT is expected even  
Andy Jefferson (JIRA)


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-20-07 12:11 PM


[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...m.atlassian.ji=
ra.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529067 ]=20

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-529:
------------------------------------

This query now has the ordering constraint of=20
firstname, lastname ASCENDING

If I read the spec 14.6.6 it says=20
"The ordering statement is a String containing one or more ordering declara=
tions separated by commas. Each ordering declaration is a Java expression o=
f an orderable type:
=E2=80=A2 primitives (boolean is non-portable);
=E2=80=A2 wrappers (Boolean is non-portable);
=E2=80=A2 BigDecimal;
=E2=80=A2 BigInteger;
=E2=80=A2 String;
=E2=80=A2 Date
followed by one of the following words: "ascending", "descending","asc", or=
"desc"."

So shouldn't the ordering constraint should be=20
firstname ASCENDING, lastname ASCENDING
???
"firstname ASCENDING" is an "ordering declaration" using spec verbage, as i=
s "lastname ASCENDING". Unless we're having inbuilt default of ASCENDING, b=
ut I didn't read that from the spec.

> ChangeQuery - DISTINCT is expected even though it is not specified
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-529
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: tck2
>            Reporter: Ilan Kirsh
>            Assignee: Craig Russell
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
>         Attachments: jdo-529.patch
>
>
> Test org.apache.jdo.tck.query.api.ChangeQuery expects 3 result objects:
> List expectedResult =3D Arrays.asList(new Object[] {
>             new FullName("emp1First", "emp1Last"),=20
>             new FullName("emp2First", "emp2Last"),
>             new FullName("emp5First", "emp5Last")});
> But actually there should be 4 result objects:
> List expectedResult =3D Arrays.asList(new Object[] {
>             new FullName("emp1First", "emp1Last"),=20
>             new FullName("emp2First", "emp2Last"),
>             new FullName("emp2First", "emp2Last"),
>             new FullName("emp5First", "emp5Last")});
> because the result is not specified as DISTINCT.

--=20
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register