-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is periodic information about the services offered at the
Panta Rhei Remailer. It is posted to this newsgroup once a week.
This information was last updated on: 18.08.2007

STATS:
Download stats generated by the Panta Rhei Remailer here:

Cpunk Stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/rlist2.txt
Cpunk Chain stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/rchain.txt
Cpunk Keys URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/allkeys.txt
Mix Stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/mlist2.html
Type2.list ; Pubring.mix
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/type2.lis ;
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/pubring.mix

These statistics are also posted daily to
alt.privacy.anon-server.stats

OPEN PORTS:
Panta Rhei can receive TLS and SMTP on ports 25 and 2525
and TLS only on ports 465 and 587.

HIDDEN SERVICE:
There is now a hidden service inside the TOR network on:

rjgcfnw4sd2jaqfu.onion port 25 connects to Panta SMTP server
rjgcfnw4sd2jaqfu.onion port 119 connects to Panta NEWS server

NYMSERVER:
The nymserver at Panta Rhei is at nym.panta-rhei.eu.org
Send email to remailer-key@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org for the keys.
Config messages have to be sent to config@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org.
Get a list of used nym acount names by sending email to
list@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org

The Nymserver at Panta Rhei uses the PERL script from sourceforge.
It is modified to allow the use of both RSA and DH/DSS keys.

MAIL2NEWS
The mail2news gateway at Panta Rhei can be found at
mail2news-hashcash AT panta-rhei.eu.org and
mail2news-hashcash_nospam AT panta-rhei.eu.org

POSTING RULES
To avoid spamming and flooding of newsgroups the Panta Rhei Remailer
enforces a hashcash requirement for all postings via the remailer
and the mail2news gateway. There is a size limit of 30kb, all
messages exceeding the limit are silently dropped.

To post to any group other than alt.anonymous.messages and alt.test
you have to include a hashcash token minted to the following
requirements:
Bits: 27
Resource: panta-rhei
Tokens are valid for 60 days from creation.

More information about hashcash can be found at www.hashcash.org.
A simple minter for win32 can be downloaded at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/downloads/
Alternatively you can use the Panta JBN mod which includes the
hashcash minter.

Panta Rhei Remailer Keys:

Admin
DSA: 0xA6A032C8, 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B2 DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
RSA: 0xB2FD58C5, 918F 1651 5577 BD8B 7D34 26F3 6829 759A

Remailer
DSA: 0xA2D16A64, C77F D098 D3BC 0731 C042  171E 2AFD 0DBE A2D1 6A64
RSA: 0xB7D44BAD, 7B0A 01ED E82A 76E3  30F1 E228 CAC1 B4C6

Nymserver
DSA: 0xD7ECC0F5, D883 09B0 CD5A 8BCC 172E  5ED6 B8A5 C994 D7EC C0F5
RSA: 0xC376A879, 4875 5573 FA58 E5A8  4332 CB1A 8FA2 D08C

THESAURUS
You can find a collection of remailer-x replies from many remailers at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/thesaurus/Thesaurus.html

NEWSGROUPS
You can read on-topic newsgroups directly in your browser at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/news/

I currently carry alt.privacy.anon-server and a few other newsgroups.
If you want something added just ask.

WIKI
There is now a WiKi on the Panta Rhei website which will hopefully
contain a lot of information soon.
The WiKi is here: https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/pantawiki
If you have anything to contribute, please do not hesitate to edit it.

TOOLS
Download privacy software from the Panta Rhei Remailer.
You will find PGP 6.5.8ckt which is one of the most trusted PGP versions
available. You can also download JBN2 which is a very convenient remailer
client. The help files for JBN2 and an enhanced version of JBN2 are also
available.
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/downloads/

More information can be found on the Panta Rhei Remailer homepage at:
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/

I hope you find the Panta Rhei Remailer useful,
If you have suggestions do not hesitate to contact me,
Cheers,
panta-admin
admin at panta-rhei dot eu dot org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/ AwUBRsbb3tcrLUqmoDLIEQIR0QCbB+h5FUqHhIQR
BDiE1+zqmReOexoAoL4n
C0vupZKCBvmhb5MzJC225ojI
=eQUi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

panta-admin wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

<snip>

Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@pan
ta-rhei.eu.org>"
aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.
org>"
Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (An
onymous)
wrote:

>:panta-admin wrote:
>:
>:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> Hash: SHA1
>:
>:<snip>
>:
>:Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@p
anta-rhei.eu.org>"
>:                aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@
panta-rhei.dyndns.org>"
>:Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8

 ========================================
=======

Very interesting and strange.   I also get a bad sig:


***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02
.2008]
<admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B
2  DD9A D72B
2D4A A6A0 32C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the vilific
ation I have
had  to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced (and 
very well
respected) remop has a problem.    Now it only needs one (anyone) to find it
 _does_
verify and we are back at square one.

I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own boundar
ies, but it
does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology to
 this group
in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.

Let us see if he is man enough.

Doctor Who

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (An
onymous)
wrote:

>:panta-admin wrote:
>:
>:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> Hash: SHA1
>:
>:<snip>
>:
>:Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
><admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>" :                aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [
Expires
>23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.org>" :Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032
C8

 ========================================
=======

Very interesting and strange.   I also get a bad sig:


***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02
.2008]
<admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B
2  DD9A D72B
2D4A A6A0 32C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the vilific
ation I
have had  to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced 
(and very
well
respected) remop has a problem.    Now it only needs one (anyone) to find it
 _does_
verify and we are back at square one.

I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own boundar
ies, but it
does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology to
 this group
in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.

Let us see if he is man enough.

Doctor Who

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

 iQEVAwUBRvg6fGToeXEUpganAQMX+gf8DDNYqnKn
+fHMc7Sfn5sMwEUxdwIvUryt
 njWlcWaphnTLSzL9R8P+GQHeOXIsGnglw2eCljzu
k1YOGGCrtvGte5gjv1xVmlZr
 gvM4eDDULLOIdFEiMQIIIqRsYCmu320KsnfBSOuo
cuIZlxZjKcm8R52cBOzzdKg/
6FCq4mbD+lyXWPK0TQFC1CmD1a7OS/sT5RD5Yg5G0LGb9rYMDPxAiRWUFKoBja1Y
 PRnUCJjWpnVWwD+2nkvNFpr9atW6IAwmSKUm0Zpb
QQzXuk2ZH2P9aH0Wf5OX4plt
 sNxkOP0cDW+v3oRl874ljh5OjSsK8clCFYkZp5Qk
IezJO/b2ghgg2g==
=eTCB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Doctor Who wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST),
> nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous) wrote:
> 
>
>  ========================================
=======
>
> Very interesting and strange.   I also get a bad sig:
>
>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
> 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553
> A8B2  DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
> There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
> vilification I have had  to put up with from some,

You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.

You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.

That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Doctor Who wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST),
> nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous) wrote:
> 
>
>  ========================================
=======
>
> Very interesting and strange.   I also get a bad sig:
>
>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
> 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553
> A8B2  DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
> There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
> vilification I have had  to put up with from some, it now appears
> that even an experienced (and very well
> respected) remop has a problem.    Now it only needs one (anyone) to
> find it _does_ verify and we are back at square one.
>
> I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own
> boundaries, but it does suggest that at least one individual should
> offer a profound apology to this group in general and to me in
> particular for all the time he has wasted.
>
> Let us see if he is man enough.
>
> Doctor Who

Nobody ever said it was just you lying sock puppet. Everyone plainly
said there's some very common things that cause sigs to fail. You're
guilty of at least one of them. So is Panta. 20 to 1 odds he'll be man
enough to do something constructive about it instead of wasting weeks
acting like an immature little brat and nymhopping to make it look like
someone supports his childish bullshit.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Doctor Who wrote:

> There is more going on here than any of us understand.

No there isn't. Only you are confused and too childish to figure out
what your problem is. Only you are playing sock puppet games to make it
look like someone agrees with you. Everyone else realizes that
cleartext signatures need to be used on plain text only and break if
htere's any oddness in that text.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:

>
> Doctor Who wrote:
> 
>
> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>
> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.

I don't know where the little creep gets off saying people don't
understand things. There's some pretty common causes of broken PGP
signatures in messages, and if we saw the original text before it's
signed it's s sure bet someone would spot the cause pretty quick.

But the coward couldn't keep yapping about understanding and pretending
everyone is as stupid as he is if he did that, so it will never happen.

>
> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.
>

Not like that was any sort of accomplishment. You could have put his
credibility in a thimble and still had room for a thimble full of
something useful. ;)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article < eb2baba60f3b74ebb56c5c7b5223935f@remaile
r.privacy.at>
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
>
> Doctor Who wrote: 
>
> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>
> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.
>
> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.

I hope one day both of you come to realize how little the rest of us gives
a shit about any of this.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org
>(Anonymous)
>wrote:
> 
>
> ========================================
=======
>
>Very interesting and strange.   I also get a bad sig:
>
>
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.0
2.2008]
><admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8
B2
>DD9A D72B
>2D4A A6A0 32C8
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
>There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
>vilification I have
>had  to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced
>(and very well
>respected) remop has a problem.    Now it only needs one (anyone) to find
>it _does_
>verify and we are back at square one.
>
>I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own
>boundaries, but it
>does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology
>to this group
>in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.
>
>Let us see if he is man enough.
>
>Doctor Who


I don't think there's a comparison here.  Panta's message didn't have any
funky encoding, note the headers:


Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Date: 24 Sep 2007 07:04:29 -0000
Organization: remailer network
Message-ID: <1VMDALJ439349.3781134259@anonymous.poster>
From: panta-admin <admin at panta-rhei DOT dyndns DOT org>
Subject: [INFO] Panta Rhei Remailer
Comments: Remailed message. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for abuse info.
X-Remailer-Contact: admin@panta-rhei.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: news.panta-rhei.eu.org 1190617469 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2007
09:04:29+0200)
Lines: 132
Path: authen.puce.readfreenews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octan
ews.net!news.glorb.com!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.defeeder.erje.ne
tnews2.arglkargh.de!news.panta-rhei.eu.org!not-for-mail
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]