[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12530475 ]

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1059:
----------------------------------------------

yep, but this is why I said the we can't either revert the logic : it would 
be as flaw as the original one.

We have to find another way to handle those cases.

> Interceptor bypass logic is flawed
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1059
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.1
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>             Fix For: 1.5.2
>
>
> We currently have many places in the code where we are hard-coding the byp
assed interceptor (ie, the interceptors which won't be called).
> I think this logic is flawed : as we can add new interceptors, those newly
 interceptors will be called, or the code where those bypasses are declared 
should be modified.
> Reverting the logic won't help : if we create a list of called interceptor
s instead of a list of bypassed interceptors, then we will still have to mod
ify the code to add those new interceptors in the chain.
> Some other way to handle interceptors should be find to allow users to add new int
erceptors without any problem.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]