 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-22-07 12:11 PM
A friend who has no router ,and only a laptop, wants to use voip.
I've never tested the SPA-3102 as a router. Has anyone tested it in
the UK (PPoA) and found it to work reliably? This would be operating
with a VM supplied cable router.
---
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
---
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-22-07 12:11 PM
Brian A wrote:
> A friend who has no router ,and only a laptop, wants to use voip.
> I've never tested the SPA-3102 as a router. Has anyone tested it in
> the UK (PPoA) and found it to work reliably? This would be operating
> with a VM supplied cable router.
PPPoA has nothing to do with cable, so forget about it. It should just work.
--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
12:21:10 up 1 day, 22 min, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.07, 0.05
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-22-07 06:11 PM
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:22:09 +0100, alexd <troffasky@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Brian A wrote:
>
>
>PPPoA has nothing to do with cable, so forget about it. It should just work.[/vbcol
]
I wondered about that. Thanks for pointing that out.
---
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
---
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-23-07 06:11 PM
Woody presented the following explanation :
> "Brian A" <no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1mtoh3t2ll6v19etmkqv0poqbq73cpbjpc@
4ax.com...
>
> Why use the 3102 as a router if the friend already has one supplied by VM?
> Just stick it on an unused port.
I suspect he means "supplied cable modem"
> However do beware of one problem with VOIP - if the router is using NAT th
en
> you will almost certainly need multiple port fowarding.
This should be completely unecessary with most if not all VoIP
providers.
> I had a Belkin
> wireless router which would only allow one port to be forwarded to any one
> given IP address downstream and I just could not get VOIP to work. Switche
d
> it with a Netgear and all worked/works perfectly.
I have no ports forwarded whatsoever & have multiple
providers/devices/pbx behind my router
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-24-07 12:11 AM
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:05:15 +0100, Jono <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid>
wrote:
>Woody presented the following explanation :
>
>I suspect he means "supplied cable modem"
You are correct. I see the mistake I made. Yes, he has no router just
a cable modem.
Presumably though, if this was an ADSL situation, then there would be
problems using it as a router unless, possibly, on AOL, where,
certainly at one time, if not now, I do believe they used PPoE.
I have set up an SPA-3102 on VOIP, not my own, but I never bothered
with the router part. In the case of someone without a router, who
only wants to run one computer, it is an ideal product to operate with
a cable modem but not, generally, I would assume with the vast
majority of UK ADSL ISPs who use PPoA. Why Linksys don't make it
compatible with PPoA I can't imagine. It seems to be typical US
parochialism.
---
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
---
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-24-07 12:11 AM
"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.bc797d7a45693ba7.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
> Woody presented the following explanation :
>
> I suspect he means "supplied cable modem"
>
>
> This should be completely unecessary with most if not all VoIP
> providers.
>
>
> I have no ports forwarded whatsoever & have multiple
> providers/devices/pbx behind my router
>
>
Sorry to argue Jono, but I'm only speaking from experience.
I signed up with Sipgate (no credit) and downloaded the free
ready-customised XLite softfone. It would work with incoming calls but
no way outgoing (to their free test number or another Sipgate user.)
Interminttently I spent about a month trying to get it to go with no
joy. Then I bought the SPA2000 - and had <exactly> the same problems. It
wouldn't work with voip.co.uk either, as wouldn't a non-customised
XLite. Even Sipgate and voip helplines were unable to come up with a
solution.
I picked up a Netgear at the right price and had the same problem. I
then set the router to fixed internal addresses (still using DHCP from
the cable modem,) put on the port forwarding, and behold it worked and
still does.
I am also on VM (well, ntlworld actually.)
--
Woody
harrogate three at ntlworld dot com
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-24-07 12:11 AM
After serious thinking Woody wrote :
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Sorry to argue Jono, but I'm only speaking from experience.
I do not dispute that your Belkin device couldn't be configured
suitably, nor would I disagree that port forwarding used to always be
necessary, However, with a decent router & service provider, you
should'nt need to these days.
> I signed up with Sipgate (no credit) and downloaded the free ready-customi
sed
> XLite softfone. It would work with incoming calls but no way outgoing (to
> their free test number or another Sipgate user.) Interminttently I spent
> about a month trying to get it to go with no joy. Then I bought the SPA200
0 -
> and had <exactly> the same problems. It wouldn't work with voip.co.uk eith
er,
> as wouldn't a non-customised XLite. Even Sipgate and voip helplines were
> unable to come up with a solution.
>
> I picked up a Netgear at the right price and had the same problem. I then
set
> the router to fixed internal addresses (still using DHCP from the cable
> modem,) put on the port forwarding, and behold it worked and still does.
I have a Linksys WRT54G & have no ports forwarded anymore. In fact,
IIRC, I /solved/ some issues when I disabled port forwarding a couple
of years ago.
> I am also on VM (well, ntlworld actually.)
ex-BY for me.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-26-07 12:11 PM
my configuration to the one in question is almost identical
VM - cable modem - linksys 2102 voip/router - single pc
Line 1: Voxalot - 2 VSP - Voipcheapcom for outgoing and Orbtalk for
incoming
Line 2: Voxalot only - so I can natter with friends & family who also
have a Voxalot account, and leave Line 1 free for business calls!
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-26-07 12:11 PM
Brian A wrote:
> I have set up an SPA-3102 on VOIP, not my own, but I never bothered
> with the router part. In the case of someone without a router, who
> only wants to run one computer, it is an ideal product to operate with
> a cable modem but not, generally, I would assume with the vast
> majority of UK ADSL ISPs who use PPoA. Why Linksys don't make it
> compatible with PPoA I can't imagine. It seems to be typical US
> parochialism.
The Linksys SPA-3102 doesn't have an ATM interface, so PPPoA would be of no
use whatsoever.
--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm@ale.cx)
10:26:32 up 4 days, 22:28, 2 users, load average: 0.06, 0.09, 0.12
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Re: SPA-3102 as a router in the UK |
 |
 |
|
|
10-27-07 12:11 AM
Woody schreef:
> "Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
> news:mn.bc797d7a45693ba7.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
>
> Sorry to argue Jono, but I'm only speaking from experience.
>
> I signed up with Sipgate (no credit) and downloaded the free
> ready-customised XLite softfone. It would work with incoming calls but
> no way outgoing (to their free test number or another Sipgate user.)
> Interminttently I spent about a month trying to get it to go with no
> joy. Then I bought the SPA2000 - and had <exactly> the same problems. It
> wouldn't work with voip.co.uk either, as wouldn't a non-customised
> XLite. Even Sipgate and voip helplines were unable to come up with a
> solution.
>
> I picked up a Netgear at the right price and had the same problem. I
> then set the router to fixed internal addresses (still using DHCP from
> the cable modem,) put on the port forwarding, and behold it worked and
> still does.
>
> I am also on VM (well, ntlworld actually.)
>
>
I guess that's why the SPA3102 worked for me instantly, because i
connected the SPA on a LAN port of my router, only did set the LINE1
voice menu, en left DHCP on router still running, guess that QoS is not
running, so this would be a other case, if i had a ADSL modem only
device, > seperate switch > SPA3102 on switch > router on
SPA3102....with DHCP switch on, on SPA and swited off on router ?
--
The Fug.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
|
|
|
|
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum
|
 |
|
 |
|