11-17-07 12:16 PM
Mostly the difference in your case would be small, but still perhaps
important to you. Your system is manual, and requires you to remember and
actually do it. Any backup program worth it's salt will do it automatically
in the background with no attention on your part. You would always have a
current backup at whatever schedule you set.
The flash drive is a great idea, and I have my key documents backed up to
like this. The original copy on drive C:, an automatic hourly backup to
drive D:, a daily backup to external drive J:, and a sort-of every two day
backup to a flash drive. Each backup is a synchronized exact copy of the
original. All changes in the original are reflected automatically in the
backup, including file deletions.
A simply copy gradually grows, because deleted files remain on the copy
untouched by the copy process. Some folks prefer that, as a simple
versioning system. I don't. The backup software (freeware) gives me the
choice for each folder I backup.
Since it is free, automatic, and flexible, even in our case a backup program
like Karen's Replicator would be of value.
--
Blessings & peace --- Ray
"GSD" <nospam@badexample.com> wrote in message
news:473ea794$0$10671$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>I run just a one user PC and back up to flash drives my Quicken program and
>have copied "My documents" folder on to a CD .
> What I would like to know is for a user with limited data like myself that
> does not change too often what is the difference in just copying all
> these file to some external media or using a Back Up software program . Is
> copying any different to Backup and what advantage does a Backup program
> give me .
> I know some programs give me the opportunity to take an image but I do
> not think I would be computer sophisticated enough to restore anyway even
> if it worked .
> I would be glad of any comments .
>
> Graeme
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|