12-21-07 06:16 AM
It unravels piece by piece. A disturbed anonym Hal@2001.com has today been
demonstrated to be none other than ex-Judge Brian Lafferty-
1) The anon <Hal@2001.com> posted (using superfeeds a/k/a pronews which
masks the IP and other identifying characteristic) some scandalous stuff at
13:03, in reply to a post from <neil.thehistorian@gmail.com> and
2) then at 13:09 merely 6 minutes later Lafferty bl@nowhere.com posted the
identical salacious junk, word for word the same and describing his own
personal experience, in reply to the same original neilpost and
3) the significance of Lafferty's post being a reply to <neil.thehistorian@
gmail.com> and not to <Hal@2001.com> (as the references header) proves is
that
Lafferty cannot claim he was merely quoting <Hal@2001.com> in an unorthodox
way and without adding a word.
So was the recent spate of remailer abuse from Marcus W as I read was
"proved"?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec....a2bf38a7201b27c
I wonder. Anything to say, Judge? One must ask if you have been caught
hiding
behind <Hal@2001.com> and Superfeeds what else have you been doing
anonymously?
Can someone find what else has been done by <Hal@2001.com> of superfeeds?
Let us
see what the Judge does when he thinks no one is watching.
Poor Sam. With allies like that, who needs enemies? Honorable Judge (not
just ALJ) Chin has a sufficient number of credible suspects for
whodundastingtruong.
And so it goes.
Message from discussion Typical Document from a nasty divorce
View parsed - Show only message text
Subject: Re: Typical Document from a nasty divorce
From: "Hal" <Hal@2001.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:03:16 -0500
Message-ID: <1198173227_1485@sp12lax.superfeed.net>
References: <476a7db1.180588765@ca.news.verio.net>
<9d14726a-30dc-4f50-867f-2f9750aef004@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Path:
g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!sp12lax.supe
rfeed.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics
X-Proxy-User: $$no5i9e513n-z
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
<abuse@newsabusereporting.org>. Forward a copy of ALL headers INCLUDING the
body. (DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS)
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Superfeed.net does not condone,support,nor tolerate
spam or any illegal or copyrighted postings.
X-Comments: This message was posted through Superfeed.net
Organization: Superfeed.net
"The Historian" <neil.thehistor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9d14726a-30dc-4f50-867f-2f9750aef004@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 20, 9:40 am, sl...@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote:
>
> So Ms. Polgar and her former husband had a messy divorce. This could
> be nothing more than nastiness on his part.
>
According to the children's father, a guardian ad litem was appointed to
protect the interests of the children. The father told me yesterday via
telephone the when the children were alone with the guardian ad litem they
told the guardian that Truong beat them to make them study chess. I have
no
independent verification that this is true and I have email Susan Polgar
asking for comment. I have also been advised by three people that using
hot
sauce to discipline children is a common practice in Vietnam. If, repeat,
IF, the underlying facts are true what does this say for the couple who ran
their EB campaign on the supposed moral high ground?
---- Posted via Pronews.com - Premium Corporate Usenet News Provider ----
http://www.pronews.com offers corporate packages that have access to
100,000+ newsgroups
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Path:
g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink
.net!gnilink.net!trndny06.POSTED!d8cce190!not-for-mail
From: "B. Lafferty" <bl@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.politics
References: <476a7db1.180588765@ca.news.verio.net>
<9d14726a-30dc-4f50-867f-2f9750aef004@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Typical Document from a nasty divorce
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <udyaj.12798$6X.12418@trndny06>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:09:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.203.163.89
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: trndny06 1198174170 151.203.163.89 (Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:09:30 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:09:30 EST
"The Historian" <neil.thehistor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9d14726a-30dc-4f50-867f-2f9750aef004@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 20, 9:40 am, sl...@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote:
>
> So Ms. Polgar and her former husband had a messy divorce. This could
> be nothing more than nastiness on his part.
>
According to the children's father, a guardian ad litem was appointed to
protect the interests of the children. The father told me yesterday via
telephone the when the children were alone with the guardian ad litem they
told the guardian that Truong beat them to make them study chess. I have
no
independent verification that this is true and I have email Susan Polgar
asking for comment. I have also been advised by three people that using
hot
sauce to discipline children is a common practice in Vietnam. If, repeat,
IF, the underlying facts are true what does this say for the couple who ran
their EB campaign on the supposed moral high ground?
BL
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
