12-28-07 12:29 AM
Res <res@ausics.net> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> Not really, 2K sendmail sessions and using MailScanner on those boxes
> is a non issue, SA uses localrules, rules emporium, and razor only, virus
> scanner is f-prot, we did see a larger load when using clamav and its very
> slow, the expence of f-prot is very well worth it since it works in the
> order of 30 fold faster, I have had those machines at 2500, but it does
> get iffy then, and rather than double the ram, I took the cheaper option
> and just cut back 500 per box.
For the public record:
1) What do you use *before* deploying filtering based on message content?
[ which DBNSBL do you use?]
2) Have you tried to create special arrangements with top ma mail
sources? [it should help to deliver throughput averaging]
> I have on my wish list for next year 360 G5's with 8G memory,
> the 380's are overkill for front end MTA's, just takes up too much room
> and we dont need the disk space on them.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@priv.onet.pl : anfi@xl.wp.pl
Open-Sendmail: http://open-sendmail.sourceforge.net/
I DON'T THINK I'M ALONE when I say I'd like to see more and more planets
fall under the ruthless domination of our solar system.
-- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.
----
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel....hobby-site.com
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|