A scam-the-scammer campaign apparently engineered at the something awful for
um.

http://www.mannequin3d.com/powerbook/

Enjoy,
Just Jean

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 20 May 2004, ucecrusher46@hotmail.com (Just Jean) wrote in
news:bdb942ca.0405200257.18c0f7d4@posting.google.com:

> A scam-the-scammer campaign apparently engineered at the something
> awful forum.
>
> http://www.mannequin3d.com/powerbook/

Absolutely engineered at the Something Awful forums. I was reading about it
there as it unfolded. Great stuff.

Something Awful isn't too popular here because of SA's past SPEWS
commentaries (and the forumites' brief venture into this newsgroup), so
don't expect very many regulars to find the humor in this.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

ucecrusher46@hotmail.com (Just Jean) wrote in message news:<bdb942ca.0405200257.18c0f7d4@pos
ting.google.com>...
> A scam-the-scammer campaign apparently engineered at the something awful f
orum.
>
> http://www.mannequin3d.com/powerbook/
>
> Enjoy,
> Just Jean

Hilarious - entertaining - well deserved kick up the XXX for the
pondscum scammer.  What fun!!!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:33:39 GMT, "p-p-p-powerbook!"
<p-p-p-powerbook@address.invalid> wrote:
 
>
>Absolutely engineered at the Something Awful forums. I was reading about it
>there as it unfolded. Great stuff.
>
>Something Awful isn't too popular here because of SA's past SPEWS
>commentaries (and the forumites' brief venture into this newsgroup), so
>don't expect very many regulars to find the humor in this.

Actually the story has appeared here already and in general full
credit was given to the way it was done. Very well done infact.
Almost of the regulars loved it.

--
Animal

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 20 May 2004 16:53:48 +0100, Chris U
<pressedpork.animal.spamtrap@myrealbox.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:33:39 GMT, "p-p-p-powerbook!"
><p-p-p-powerbook@address.invalid> wrote:
> 
>
>Actually the story has appeared here already and in general full
>credit was given to the way it was done. Very well done infact.
>Almost of the regulars loved it.

Did anyone but the scammer not love it?

William R. James

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:45:11 -0500, Wm James
<wrjames.remove@spamreaper.com> wrote:

> Did anyone but the scammer not love it?

FedEx probably didn't...

--
Steve

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:36:00 +0200, Steven Mäßlein
<nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 May 2004 11:45:11 -0500, Wm James
><wrjames.remove@spamreaper.com> wrote:
> 
>
>FedEx probably didn't...

Didn't they get paid?

Wiliam R. James

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]