05-26-04 09:33 PM
On Tue, 25 May 2004 06:02:07 GMT,
Elie De Brauwer <elie@N0SP4Mde-brauwer.beN0SP4M> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 05:34:02 +0000, joe wrote:
>
>
> that is why I was using du -b instead of du
>
May not be that portable
$ ls -l abcc
-rwxrwxr-x 1 xxx xxx 21 May 25 09:35 abcc
$ du -b abcc
1024 abcc
$ du abcc
1 abcc
Villy
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
