Scott must have recently started working outside wholesalebandwidth's
IP range because i've gotten several of his spews recently. Most of
them are not CAN-SPAM compliant. I know someone was looking for a few
for evidence. Here are a couple of them:

http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...carerx.com_0001
http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...direct.com_0001

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

>Subject: Was someone looking for non-CAN-SPAM compliant Snotties?
>From: google@toastedspam.com  (TOASTEDspam.com)
>
>Scott must have recently started working outside wholesalebandwidth's
>IP range because i've gotten several of his spews recently. Most of
>them are not CAN-SPAM compliant. I know someone was looking for a few
>for evidence. Here are a couple of them:
>
>http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...carerx.com_0001
>http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...direct.com_0001

The first link has nothing to do with us.

The second link is an email from an affiliate in our CPAEmpire program.  The
link in the original email is now invalid.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

InfoOptInBig wrote:

> [snip]
>
> The second link is an email from an affiliate in our CPAEmpire program.  T
he
> link in the original email is now invalid.

What URL is your affiliate using now?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

InfoOptInBig wrote:

>
> The second link is an email from an affiliate in our CPAEmpire
> program.  The link in the original email is now invalid.

Here. let me fix your typos for you, Snotty:

"The second link is an email from an 'affiliate'(wink,wink) in our
SPAM-Empire program."


oooh. that little bump on your neck looks like it's itchy and sensitive. Got
any cream you can put on that?
--
Gib

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"TOASTEDspam.com" <google@toastedspam.com> wrote in message
news:a2be285b.0405261051.20dd0932@posting.google.com...
> Scott must have recently started working outside wholesalebandwidth's
> IP range because i've gotten several of his spews recently. Most of
> them are not CAN-SPAM compliant. I know someone was looking for a few
> for evidence. Here are a couple of them:
>
> http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...carerx.com_0001
> http://www.toastedspam.com/stupid/d...direct.com_0001

Can-spam/non-can-spam its all the same shite to me, I still regard spammers
as lower than a politicians belly. Snotty seems to like sending porno
(amongst others) spams to harvested addresses, a female friend of the family
was most disconcerted to get one in her email. He also doesn't seem to
realise that .nz addresses are not in the USA, but I guess when you're
spamming millions a day to addresses he hopes are in the USA what's a few
that land elsewhere really matter?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

infooptinbig@aol.com (InfoOptInBig) wrote in
news:20040526210814.25678.00002327@mb-m07.aol.com:

> The first link has nothing to do with us.

Right, and Scott richter had nothing to do with transfer and sale of stolen
property.

--
Tired of spam in your mailbox?
Come to http://www.spamblocked.com
Don't spam <A HREF="mailto:remote-printer.Mary_Higgins/Investor_Relations@
12029429634.iddd.tpc.int">this.</a>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 27 May 2004 18:15:10 GMT, "The Open Sourceror's Apprentice"
<MorelyDotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:

>infooptinbig@aol.com (InfoOptInBig) wrote in
>news:20040526210814.25678.00002327@mb-m07.aol.com:
> 
>
>Right, and Scott richter had nothing to do with transfer and sale of stolen
>property.

I wonder if that AOL address is one Snotty uses to test AOL spam
filters.. ???


--
Animal

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Andy Lawson" <nanoo@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message news:<GUgtc.4222$FN.4
41384@news02.tsnz.net>...

> Can-spam/non-can-spam its all the same shite to me, I still regard spammer
s
> as lower than a politicians belly. Snotty seems to like sending porno
> (amongst others) spams to harvested addresses, a female friend of the fami
ly
> was most disconcerted to get one in her email. He also doesn't seem to
> realise that .nz addresses are not in the USA, but I guess when you're
> spamming millions a day to addresses he hopes are in the USA what's a few
> that land elsewhere really matter?

In 1996 I got spam promoting some environmentalist movement based in
Washington DC who were participating in the elections - spam sent to
my Danish (.dk) address. I sent an email back to them telling that,
since I was living in Denmark, I had no possibility to vote in the US
elections. They replied telling me that they believed '.dk' was the
TLD for Dakota. I asked them which one - North or South Dakota - and I
am still waiting for the answer...

--
Nick the Amateur LARTist

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <20040526210814.25678.00002327@mb-m07.aol.com>,
infooptinbig@aol.com (InfoOptInBig) wrote:
 
>
> The first link has nothing to do with us.


Such a transparent lie, Snotty.  Do try to do better with your
haven/remove links.


> The second link is an email from an affiliate in our CPAEmpire
> program.  The link in the original email is now invalid.


Ah, the old 'an affiliate did it' excuse.  That's not at all
believable, especially as you're a spammer yourself.


Richard

--
To reply via email, make sure you don't enter the whirlpool on river left.

My mailbox. My property. My personal space. My rules. Deal with it.
http://www.river.com/users/share/cluetrain/

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Fri, 28 May 2004 14:11:57 -0600, Richard Johnson
<rnews@whirlpool.river.com> wrote:
 
>
>
>Such a transparent lie, Snotty.  Do try to do better with your
>haven/remove links.
>
> 
>
>
>Ah, the old 'an affiliate did it' excuse.  That's not at all
>believable, especially as you're a spammer yourself.

Strange they both carried indentical hash buster as the last line.

hello friends: suspensory hemiglossitis subshrub incomprehending
irresistibleness averse


--
Animal

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]