Tapedrive performance / shoes shining?
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > WebserverTalk Community > Data Storage > Tapedrive performance / shoes shining?




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Tapedrive performance / shoes shining?  
Benno...


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
05-30-04 04:10 PM

Hello,

we have a Compaq/HP MSL6030 tape library (with one LTO2 drive) that is
connected to a dedicated Ultra320 SCSI card on a Compaq ML370 (PIII
933Mhz/256MB).
We use BackupExec 9.0 on Windows 2000 with the Veritas tape drivers. The
best backup transferrate we see (on a local RAID5 disk set with
relatively large files ~100KB/5MB, 90GB total) is around 640MB/min
(average). The LTO drive itself should be capable of 1920MB/min
(32MB/sec) a.f.a.i.k.
Is there any way to check what the bottleneck is here? The verify speed
is very high at 2200MB/min (higher then the theoretical maximum).

Any ideas?

--
Benno...





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Tapedrive performance / shoes shining?  
Rob Turk


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
05-30-04 04:10 PM

"Benno..." <0@0.invalid> wrote in message
news:407e5e45$0$5069$4d4ebb8e@news.nl.uu.net...
> Hello,
>
> we have a Compaq/HP MSL6030 tape library (with one LTO2 drive) that is
> connected to a dedicated Ultra320 SCSI card on a Compaq ML370 (PIII
> 933Mhz/256MB).
> We use BackupExec 9.0 on Windows 2000 with the Veritas tape drivers. The
> best backup transferrate we see (on a local RAID5 disk set with
> relatively large files ~100KB/5MB, 90GB total) is around 640MB/min
> (average). The LTO drive itself should be capable of 1920MB/min
> (32MB/sec) a.f.a.i.k.
> Is there any way to check what the bottleneck is here? The verify speed
> is very high at 2200MB/min (higher then the theoretical maximum).
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> Benno...

Monitor the disk that holds the BackupExec index data. There's a good chance
it is the bottleneck due to BE needing to update it's index database for
each file it processes.

Rob







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register