06-26-04 07:26 PM
>>If you translate these bytes from one character code to another, you will
render them incomprehensible.
Even if I save it as a new file?
"Charles Jardine" <cj10@cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:can94g$8id$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk...
> dafon wrote:
>
>
> Then you won't have available to you any tools relevant to
> the difficult task of converting the data in a tape written by
> one of the old EBCDIC based IBM OSs into a form suitable for
> use on a modern OS.
>
> This is not just a matter of converting the character code,
> although that can be hard enough, as there were many different
> EBDCIC code pages. You have also to cope with the fact the
> the old IBM OSs used structured files. Not every byte in such
> a file necessarily represents a character. Some byte sequences
> may be block descriptors or record descriptors. These were not
> encoded in the character code, but were binary values. If you
> translate these bytes from one character code to another, you
> will render them incomprehensible.
>
> Since these file formats were going out of fashion at the same
> time as the Web was coming into fashion, you probably won't
> find much information about this topic on the Web.
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|