07-01-04 10:57 PM
"Jonathan Maltz [MS-MVP]" <jmaltz@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:OT0h3WwXEHA.3716@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Nope - that's the nature of FTP.
By the strict definition that "FTP is what is defined in RFC 959". There
are other documents that extend FTP to provide security in various different
forms.
> There's a "SFTP" but IIS' FTP service doesn't support it, and, if I recall
> correctly, it's actually a different protocol than FTP but hold a similar
> name
Yes, SFTP is a completely different protocol - I don't know why the SSH
protocol designers chose to use a name that is going to cause this sort of
confusion. FTPS, on the other hand, is FTP with SSL capabilities added.
There are a large number of third-party solutions for FTPS, including
clients, servers and proxies, that would allow you to run your own choice of
FTP client or server with encryption of commands and data traffic.
Alun.
~~~~
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|