"Peter Hucker" <hucker@clara.co.uk> wrote:

>chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: 
>
>I mean YOU are the one complaining about them,

Idiot.  I would not have even responded to your huge ugly posts, if it
had not been to berate you for you laziness.  It wouldn't do much good
for me to trim a post that I don't intend to send, now does it?
You've done the damage, posted the garbage, wasted the bandwidth, and
there's nothing I can do about it.

>god you're SLOW!

My wondering about your erroneous word usage does not make me "slow",
idiot.  Rather ironic, from the fool who can't even figure out why
it's not good to send unreadable garbage all over usenet.

Don't you know you're stupid?
 
>
>You think EVERY poster has to snip?  Think about it.  Only 1 person in a 2 person c
onversation snips, the posts only get 1 quotation too long!

Yet, in this case, neither one of you stupid top posters snipped, as
is normal for top posters.  Your hypothetic "if" is meaningless.
 
>
>You managed to reply to it, didn't you?

Idiot.  Are you implying that the fact that someone complained somehow
makes your garbage-posting less stupid?
 
>
>QED!

Idiot!

"Ray's brother" indeed.  Whoever "Ray" is...  I guess it's common for
top posters to expect others to work at understanding what the hell
they are talking about.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]