On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:53:40 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> "Peter Hucker" <hucker@clara.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>
> Idiot.  I would not have even responded to your huge ugly posts, if it
> had not been to berate you for you laziness.  It wouldn't do much good
> for me to trim a post that I don't intend to send, now does it?
> You've done the damage, posted the garbage, wasted the bandwidth, and
> there's nothing I can do about it.

Bandwidth?  What are you on a 1200 baud?
 
>
> My wondering about your erroneous word usage does not make me "slow",
> idiot.  Rather ironic, from the fool who can't even figure out why
> it's not good to send unreadable garbage all over usenet.
>
> Don't you know you're stupid?

I have no idea what you are referring to, as you have stupidly snipped the r
equired context.
 
>
> Yet, in this case, neither one of you stupid top posters snipped, as
> is normal for top posters.  Your hypothetic "if" is meaningless.

I am not a top poster.  Get that through your thick head.

And if two people are the only ones conversing at that moment, and neither c
ares about long unsnipped messages, then where lies the problem?
 
>
> Idiot.  Are you implying that the fact that someone complained somehow
> makes your garbage-posting less stupid?

You said unreadable.  But you read it.  Clever that eh?
 
>
> Idiot!
>
> "Ray's brother" indeed.  Whoever "Ray" is...  I guess it's common for
> top posters to expect others to work at understanding what the hell
> they are talking about.

Someone with several socks, who can write nothing useful to anyone, but just
 writes IDIOT everywhere.


--
13 parrots and rising  http://www.petersparrots.com
93 silly video clips   http://www.insanevideoclips.com
1259 digital photos    http://www.petersphotos.com
Served from a pentawatercooled dual 2.8GHz silent Athlon with half TB RAID.

Does the Little Mermaid wear an algebra?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]