Hi,

I am using Biztalk Server 2002 with SP1. Since two days I get following
errors.
Could someone help me? I donīt know why these errors pop up. I donīt changed
anything at the system configuration. Something what also does not happen to
work now is, passing values to a external vbs file with the config array in
MSCExecute.

Thanks in Advance
Florian



Programm-ID der Komponente:
Serveranwendungs-ID: {6ECD95AC-3C06-4A9B-9D43-4565C1BD3319}
Serveranwendungsname: BizTalk Server Internal Utilities
Ausnahme: C0000005
Adresse: 0x735968FC
Aufrufliste:
vbscript + 0x268FC
vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x1ED0
vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x2D0D
vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x2DD9
vbscript!DllGetClassObject + 0x13E76
vbscript + 0x26210
SharedComp + 0x1B5DB
SharedComp + 0x1B188
 CISENGINE!CFakeLock::ReadOrWriteUnlock(b
ool) + 0x2716
 CISENGINE!CFakeLock::ReadOrWriteUnlock(b
ool) + 0x1576
CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x1354
CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x10A8
CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0xBE0
CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x499
CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x6EE
 CISENGINE!LKRhash::CLKRHashTable::End(vo
id) + 0x5CAA
TxfAux + 0x35C61
ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x2E94
ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x3153
ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x350A
TxfAux!CoGetInterceptorForOle32 + 0x2FD7
MSCIS!SchedulerRunning(void) + 0x105E
KERNEL32!TlsSetValue + 0xF0

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I believe this is a known issue. See KB article 820674. A hotfix is
available from PSS.

--
Jeff Lynch
"A BizTalk Enthusiast"
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/



"Florian Schneider" <florian.schneider@cancom.de> wrote in message
news:u$YncFGeEHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> I am using Biztalk Server 2002 with SP1. Since two days I get following
> errors.
> Could someone help me? I donīt know why these errors pop up. I donīt
changed
> anything at the system configuration. Something what also does not happen
to
> work now is, passing values to a external vbs file with the config array
in
> MSCExecute.
>
> Thanks in Advance
> Florian
>
>
>
> Programm-ID der Komponente:
> Serveranwendungs-ID: {6ECD95AC-3C06-4A9B-9D43-4565C1BD3319}
> Serveranwendungsname: BizTalk Server Internal Utilities
> Ausnahme: C0000005
> Adresse: 0x735968FC
> Aufrufliste:
> vbscript + 0x268FC
> vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x1ED0
> vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x2D0D
> vbscript!DllCanUnloadNow + 0x2DD9
> vbscript!DllGetClassObject + 0x13E76
> vbscript + 0x26210
> SharedComp + 0x1B5DB
> SharedComp + 0x1B188
>  CISENGINE!CFakeLock::ReadOrWriteUnlock(b
ool) + 0x2716
>  CISENGINE!CFakeLock::ReadOrWriteUnlock(b
ool) + 0x1576
> CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x1354
> CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x10A8
> CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0xBE0
> CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x499
> CISENGINE!GetNewStateEngine(struct IInterchangeStateEngine * *) + 0x6EE
>  CISENGINE!LKRhash::CLKRHashTable::End(vo
id) + 0x5CAA
> TxfAux + 0x35C61
> ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x2E94
> ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x3153
> ole32!CoCreateFreeThreadedMarshaler + 0x350A
> TxfAux!CoGetInterceptorForOle32 + 0x2FD7
> MSCIS!SchedulerRunning(void) + 0x105E
> KERNEL32!TlsSetValue + 0xF0
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

This is scheduled to be included with BizTalk Server 2002 Service Pack 1.

Yoshiyuki Aoyagi


"Jeff Lynch" <jeff.lynch@houston-lynch.com> wrote in message
news:%23R9sV9oeEHA.632@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I believe this is a known issue. See KB article 820674. A hotfix is
> available from PSS.
>
> --
> Jeff Lynch
> "A BizTalk Enthusiast"
> http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/
>
>
>
> "Florian Schneider" <florian.schneider@cancom.de> wrote in message
> news:u$YncFGeEHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... 
> changed 
happen[vbcol=seagreen]
> to 
> in 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]