Hi,

I am currently having a problem getting a reliable receipt from a BT
2002 into my 2004 server. I have an orchestration that has a send port
using a pipeline the sends the XML with envelope using the BT
Framework assembler over HTTP which works fine.

I then have a receiving port which has a BT Framework disassemble
piepline, this is however not attached to anything. From my
understanding this should pick up the incoming SOAP receipt and
automatically match with the sent envelope using the uuid. But every
time I get a receipt I get the following error:

‘Could not find a matching subscription for the message.
The Messaging engine failed to process a message submitted by adapter:
FILE Source URL:\\yweb01\BizTalkFiles\UAT\REC*.xml.
Details:Could not find a matching subscription for the message. .
This error occurs if the subscribed orchestration schedule or send
port has not been started, or if some of the message properties
necessary for subscription evaluation have not been promoted.
Please refer to Health and Activity Tracking tool for more detailed
information on this failure'

I have checked the sending envelope uuid and the receipt uuid and they
match, but then again I would expect a differing error if they didn't.

Has anyone got any ideas on what this error means?

Thanks
Lee

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I found the problem, is was the sending reciept which has a namespace
in the identity element for the delivery receipt. so it looked like:

<identity xmlns="http://schemas.biztalk.org/btf-2-0/properties">uuid:ee95429
a-c52e-4949-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>

When I removed this namespace it works fine and is taken and matched
by my BT server. i.e.
<identity>uuid:ee95429a-c52e-4949-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>

Anyone know if this is something I can remove on my server end or is
it a problem from the sending BT server ?

Lee

lee.connor@trustmarquesolutions.com (Lee) wrote in message news:<6ca2bfc1.0408031306.5a4d069
4@posting.google.com>...
> Hi,
>
> I am currently having a problem getting a reliable receipt from a BT
> 2002 into my 2004 server. I have an orchestration that has a send port
> using a pipeline the sends the XML with envelope using the BT
> Framework assembler over HTTP which works fine.
>
> I then have a receiving port which has a BT Framework disassemble
> piepline, this is however not attached to anything. From my
> understanding this should pick up the incoming SOAP receipt and
> automatically match with the sent envelope using the uuid. But every
> time I get a receipt I get the following error:
>
> ?Could not find a matching subscription for the message.
> The Messaging engine failed to process a message submitted by adapter:
> FILE Source URL:\\yweb01\BizTalkFiles\UAT\REC*.xml.
> Details:Could not find a matching subscription for the message. .
> This error occurs if the subscribed orchestration schedule or send
> port has not been started, or if some of the message properties
> necessary for subscription evaluation have not been promoted.
> Please refer to Health and Activity Tracking tool for more detailed
> information on this failure'
>
> I have checked the sending envelope uuid and the receipt uuid and they
> match, but then again I would expect a differing error if they didn't.
>
> Has anyone got any ideas on what this error means?
>
> Thanks
> Lee

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I found the issue, the server I was sending to was a 2002 server which was
not SP1'd and so was putting the namepsace in. There is a hotfix for this on
the 2004 server link below:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;813845

Lee

"Lee" wrote:

> I found the problem, is was the sending reciept which has a namespace
> in the identity element for the delivery receipt. so it looked like:
>
> <identity xmlns="http://schemas.biztalk.org/btf-2-0/properties">uuid:ee954
29a-c52e-4949-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>
>
> When I removed this namespace it works fine and is taken and matched
> by my BT server. i.e.
> <identity>uuid:ee95429a-c52e-4949-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>
>
> Anyone know if this is something I can remove on my server end or is
> it a problem from the sending BT server ?
>
> Lee
>
> lee.connor@trustmarquesolutions.com (Lee) wrote in message news:<6ca2bfc1.
0408031306.5a4d0694@posting.google.com>... 
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi
It sounds like you fixed the problem.  Have you?

--------------------
Thread-Topic: Problem receiving a BTF2 receipt in BT2004
thread-index: AcR7nNZN8ClnwM1kRbGN7YElUoMWgQ==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 212.50.185.17
From: examnotes <Lee@discussions.microsoft.com>
References:  <6ca2bfc1.0408031306.5a4d0694@posting.google.com>
<6ca2bfc1.0408040225.4ba55dcd@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: Problem receiving a BTF2 receipt in BT2004
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 03:05:01 -0700
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <BC50DA39-D9DB-4197-8637-B4D95C5A0EAB@microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.framework
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.framework:3131
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.framework

I found the issue, the server I was sending to was a 2002 server which was
not SP1'd and so was putting the namepsace in. There is a hotfix for this
on
the 2004 server link below:

http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;813845

Lee

"Lee" wrote:

> I found the problem, is was the sending reciept which has a namespace
> in the identity element for the delivery receipt. so it looked like:
>
> <identity
xmlns="http://schemas.biztalk.org/btf-2-0/properties">uuid:ee95429a-c52e-494
9-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>
>
> When I removed this namespace it works fine and is taken and matched
> by my BT server. i.e.
> <identity>uuid:ee95429a-c52e-4949-bf67-4abc2b593168</identity>
>
> Anyone know if this is something I can remove on my server end or is
> it a problem from the sending BT server ?
>
> Lee
>
> lee.connor@trustmarquesolutions.com (Lee) wrote in message
news:<6ca2bfc1.0408031306.5a4d0694@posting.google.com>... 
>


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

EBusiness Server Team

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]