08-10-04 10:52 PM
Unless you install KB 840113, BizTalk Server 2004 doesn't support any schema
s not shipped in a box.
Please also read limitations of the KB.
There is no easy way to create EDI schemas. You may check with Covast, it ma
y be better to buy their accelerator.
Thanks,
Tatyana
--------------------
>From: "ErHo" <esk1818@ofir.dk>
>Subject: EDIFACT 93a IFTMIN schema
>Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 22:57:27 +0200
>Lines: 22
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
>Message-ID: <Oj8zRpYfEHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 0x50a6bfef.arcnxe1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk 80.166.191.239
>Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration:7111
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
>
>Hi,
>
>I need BizTalk Server 2004 to generate an EDI document for me based on the
>EDIFACT 93A IFTMIN standard. I plan on using just the included Base EDI
>functionality.
>
>Unfortunately the schema for IFTMIN does not seem to be included with
>BizTalk Server. What will be the easiest way of defining the schema? Will I
>need to do it from scratch and which tool should I use in that case? Or can
>I download the schema somewhere?
>
>It seems difficult to create a new EDI schema using the BizTalk Editor (the
>content of the EDI tab just gets cleared whenever I change something) and I
>have not found very much documentation on the subject. Am I going down the
>wrong road or can you point me to some docs that will help me getting
>started?
>
>Sorry if the question is stupid but I haven't used EDI with BizTalk before.
>
>Erik
>
>
>
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this mess
age are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they originated.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|