09-13-04 10:45 PM
I have done many bare metal restores using the V2i recovery CD and not had a
problem. Two of my servers are RAID5 arrays. Go to powerquest.com and read
the whitepapers on the right side nav bar - they talk about SQL Server and
Exchange. They say V2i uses the SQL Server API to backup databases
correctly. I do backup a SQL Server DB, but it is lightly used so may not
be comparable to high stress environments. I do not use Exchange.
IMO, V2i Protector is an excellent product - been using it for over a year
now - I use it quite a bit lately to get ready for server hardware/software
upgrades - it's nice to have a current copy of the production servers to
play with without any downtime.
They can't give you the restore CD as an eval, because that would be giving
away the store - basically the entire product is on there without
restrictions - they probably haven't figured out a way to eval that yet...
-- Paul
"Tristan" <tristan_d@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b58d9931.0408160329.2e67dec@posting.google.com...
> I currently use Ghost Corp Ed. to backup a number of machines in a
> corporate LAN. I recently ran into some trouble because of Ghosts
> inability to deal with certain RAID configurations, which is a bit of
> a problem as we have begun creating mirrored drives on some mission
> critial workstations. Symantec tech support suggested that I check
> out V2i Protector which I did and it looks good. The problem is that
> the demo does not support a bare metal recovery, which is exactly the
> feature that I want to test out. After discussions with Symantec they
> refuse to release a demo that contains this feature. I'm more
> interested in the V2i Protector for servers, and I'm reluctant to fork
> out over a thousand dollars just to try the product. Does anyone have
> real world experience with V2i Protector Server Edn.? Specifically,
> anyone who has used it to successfully perform hot backups for
> Exchange or SQL servers, followed by a successfull recovery from bare
> metal?
>
> Thanks,
> Tristan
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|