Hi Guys,

I am trying to bypass schema validation in receive shape
in BTS2004, that way I can detect various document type
and route it for further processing in a single
orchestration. I was able to do that in bts2002, but for
this new version, it looks receive shape in bts2004 is
strong typed - you have to supply a message type
associated with particular schmea. Does anyone know how to
work around this? in some cases, creating each
orchestration for each document type or schema is a
management overhead. Your ideas and thoughts on this are
greatly appreciated.

David

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Solution for the scenario described below is well explained at these blogs:
http://blogs.msdn.com/scottwoo/arch.../02/147120.aspx
http://www.geekswithblogs.net/sthom...08/10/9557.aspx

--------------------
| >>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| >>From: "David Cui" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
| >>Sender: "David Cui" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
| >>Subject: Multiple-schema detection in single orchestration
| >>Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:52:41 -0700
| >>Lines: 15
| >>Message-ID: <bd8301c4896c$46f4fb30$a401280a@phx.gbl>
| >>MIME-Version: 1.0
| >>Content-Type: text/plain;
| >>	charset="iso-8859-1"
| >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| >>Thread-Index: AcSJbEby5yMGSdsXS82APFt0++FIpQ==
| >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
| >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration
| >>Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
| >>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration:7824
| >>NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa12.phx.gbl 10.40.1.164
| >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration
| >>
| >>Hi Guys,
| >>
| >>I am trying to bypass schema validation in receive shape
| >>in BTS2004, that way I can detect various document type
| >>and route it for further processing in a single
| >>orchestration. I was able to do that in bts2002, but for
| >>this new version, it looks receive shape in bts2004 is
| >>strong typed - you have to supply a message type
| >>associated with particular schmea. Does anyone know how to
| >>work around this? in some cases, creating each
| >>orchestration for each document type or schema is a
| >>management overhead. Your ideas and thoughts on this are
| >>greatly appreciated.
| >>
| >>David
| >>

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

EBusiness Server Team

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thanks, that should help.
David
>-----Original Message-----
>Solution for the scenario described below is well
explained at these blogs:
>http://blogs.msdn.com/scottwoo/arch.../06/02/147120.a
spx
>http://www.geekswithblogs.net/sthom...ve/2004/08/10/9
557.aspx
>
>--------------------
>| >>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>| >>From: "David Cui"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>| >>Sender: "David Cui"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>| >>Subject: Multiple-schema detection in single
orchestration
>| >>Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:52:41 -0700
>| >>Lines: 15
>| >>Message-ID: <bd8301c4896c$46f4fb30$a401280a@phx.gbl>
>| >>MIME-Version: 1.0
>| >>Content-Type: text/plain;
>| >>	charset="iso-8859-1"
>| >>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>| >>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>| >>Thread-Index: AcSJbEby5yMGSdsXS82APFt0++FIpQ==
>| >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V5.50.4910.0300
>| >>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration
>| >>Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
>| >>Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration:7824
>| >>NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa12.phx.gbl 10.40.1.164
>| >>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.biztalk.orchestration
>| >>
>| >>Hi Guys,
>| >>
>| >>I am trying to bypass schema validation in receive
shape
>| >>in BTS2004, that way I can detect various document
type
>| >>and route it for further processing in a single
>| >>orchestration. I was able to do that in bts2002, but
for
>| >>this new version, it looks receive shape in bts2004
is
>| >>strong typed - you have to supply a message type
>| >>associated with particular schmea. Does anyone know
how to
>| >>work around this? in some cases, creating each
>| >>orchestration for each document type or schema is a
>| >>management overhead. Your ideas and thoughts on this
are
>| >>greatly appreciated.
>| >>
>| >>David
>| >>
>
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
>
>EBusiness Server Team
>
>.
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]