12-13-04 11:28 PM
It depends on the circumstances, but in general people find that library
applications are faster because they execute in-process, as opposed to a
server application which executes out-of-process.
Out of processes applications incur a performance penalty as calls to it
are performed across the process boundary requiring cross-process
marshalling.
However, I have seen instances where a server application has performed
better, so it is not a hard and fast rule.
Andrew McNerlin
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Runchey [mailto:gold_diesel@hotmail.com]
Posted At: 17 September 2004 14:47
Posted To: microsoft.public.biztalk.appintegration
Conversation: BTS 2002 .net toolkit, AIC, cannot replace file?
Subject: Re: BTS 2002 .net toolkit, AIC, cannot replace file?
How is the performance on running the an AIC as an application versus a
library?
-Ben
"Jeff Lynch" wrote:
> Jonas,
>
> This should work. I usually use a "Service Application" so that it
runs in
> it's own process.
>
> --
> Jeff Lynch
> "A BizTalk Enthusiast"
> http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jlynch/
>
>
>
> "Jonas" <Jonas@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:FBC6836B-1034-4E4D-9AAE-84294EC6D8F4@microsoft.com...
toolkit. The[vbcol=seagreen]
stop[vbcol=seagreen]
/ stop[vbcol=seagreen]
AIC and[vbcol=seagreen]
program.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|