All,

I think I have my build file set up, but I am not getting a gacit error

gacit:

[exec] C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET
2003\SDK\v1.1\\bin\gacutil.exe /u

Microsoft (R) .NET Global Assembly Cache Utility.  Version
1.1.4322.573
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1998-2002. All rights
reserved.

Option /u takes 1 argument

BUILD FAILED

C:\BizTalkLabs\EAISolution\EAISolution.sln.build(180,5):
External Program Failed: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET
2003\SDK\v1.1\\bin\gacutil.exe (return code was 1)

Total time: 15.7 seconds.

I am clueless as to know what this message means.  Can anyone out there help
me out??

Thanks!


"Asbjørn Rygg" wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
> You should only need to alter the project names for your orchestrations
> and schemas as well as the orchestration names under
> "unenlist.orchestration" to create your own deployment file. If your
> project don`t include custom pipelines or .NET components just place a
> comment around or remove those sections.. (remember the original file as
> a reference)
>
> I don`t know if this helps you, but Peter Provost has created a modified
> version of Scott Colestocks NAnt build file for BizTalk. The idea is
> that you set up a property file instead of editing inside the build file
> it self. (Note: I haven`t tested this yet..) His blog posting is here:
> http://www.peterprovost.org/archive...08/18/1802.aspx
>
> For both cases you will need to manually deploy your orchestration to
> "bootstrap" your orchestration binding file (using Deployment wizard or
> btsdeploy.exe). The sample ships with that binding file already present.
> That confused me a bit when I first tried it..
>
> The reason for choosing debug instead of development as output folders
> is to support any custom .NET components you might have in your project
> as these will already have a debug folder by default - the point is to
> have the same output folder for all your projects, being a BTS
> orchestration or a .NET component. If you only have an orchestration and
> a schema project, you can assign development instead of debug to the
> ${Configuration} variable..
>
> HTH,
> - Asbjørn
>
> Craig Butler wrote: 
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]