09-10-04 10:45 PM
Paul Kimoto wrote:
> On 2004-09-09, Jim Bowering <iambat@otvcablelandot.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Under no circumstances should you "just erase" a file that belongs to a
> package. That defeats the purpose of having a package-management system.
I'm sorry, I should have said prune and, or uninstall apt and, or apt-get.
>
>
> I don't use synaptic, but observe:
>
> $ /usr/bin/dpkg -S /usr/bin/apt-get
> apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
>
> So the proper way to get rid of apt-get is to remove the apt package.
> But then I wouldn't be able to install synaptic:
>
> $ /usr/bin/apt-get --simulate install synaptic apt-
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> synaptic: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3
> E: Broken packages
>
> That is, synaptic depends on some (horribly named) library provided by the
> apt package. (Probably it does not use the apt-get program itself.)
That's a valuable reply, thaks a lot!
Disk space, you know is not all that matters, but just wanted to
eliminate it for maintaining a clean system; nothing should be there
which don't use on a day-to-day basis.
I have installed apt-doc, dpkg-doc and maint-guide; will go through it.
Thanks,
//bsd
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|