09-23-04 02:26 AM
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:49:20 -0700, "Joel"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>I have Windows XP installed on my home computer, and am
>using it for website development. I had the "site" set up
>for anonymous authentication. I recently upgraded to
>Windows XP SP2, and it looks like I also got upgraded to
>IIS 5.1 in the process.
Nope. XP is IIS 5.1, always has been.
>After I upgraded, IIS was actually not working correctly,
>so I uninstalled and reinstalled it. It now appears to be
>processing ASP scripts correctly, and can read from a
>database I'm using. However, when I try to WRITE to the
>database I get an ASP error message saying the DB is read-
>only.
Full error messages please. Likely along this line:
Why do I get database-related 80004005 errors?
http://www.aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2009
Jeff
>When I use the iis.msc snap-in for the MMC, I configure
>the folder and file I'm trying to write to to allow write
>access. But there seems to be a disconnect with setting
>the NTFS permissions in XP SP2. When I go to explorer and
>open the "permissions" dialog box for the folder,
>the "read-only" checkbox has a checkmark in it that is
>grey, not black (like only part of the folder's contents
>are read-only). I can deselect the checkbox (i.e.,
>control is not disabled) and choose to apply the new
>settings to all the files in the directory, then
>cliick "OK", but when I re-open the properties dialog the
>checkbox has the grey check in it again.
>
>In addition, XP SP2 has a "Web Security" tab that has the
>same security settings you see in the iis.msc snap-in.
>But the settings don't necessarily match those you see/set
>in MMC. I've tried setting these to match the MMC
>settings, but that didn't work.
>
>I'm guessing that XP somehow changed the permissions
>provided to the IUSR_<servername> anonymous guest account,
>but not sure how to reset them. The security settings in
>XP SP2 are totally different than they used to be.
>
>Bottom line: I've got a file that I'm trying to write to,
>but all the new security in SP2 is making it difficult to
>even allow that. I know others have figured this out by
>now... what am I missing?
>
>Thanks in advance!
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|