>In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin[vbcol=seagreen]
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header>
>wrote:
> 

In addition to this arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the
delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant, bald-faced
LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
are:

eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Max Mustermann" <anonymous@remail.amessage.info> wrote in message
>
> His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
> you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
> filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
> are:
>
> eelbash
> axloltl
> axolotl2
> cheshire
> congo
> bog
> bogg
> eelbash (again)
> bushwa
> greatwall
> asmodeus

All I know is that when I once posted via Eelbash, he actually used my REAL
name and email address when he posted it to the newsgroup!

It seemed to me that he was baiting people, only to embarrass them by not
shielding their names and email addresses when their message was put onto
the newsgroups.

I wouldn't touch his service again.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Jeremy" <jeremy@nospam.thanks.com> wrote:

>All I know is that when I once posted via Eelbash, he actually used my REAL
>name and email address when he posted it to the newsgroup!

If you were stupid enough to give your real name to any remailer you should
be stripped naked and stood up in the village square with a hunter orange
XXXXTARD sign hanging around your neck so everybody could use you as an
example of why it's not real smart to try and stop a running chain saw with
your genitals.

Oh wait...... That's what you just did...... Thanks!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Max Mustermann <anonymous@remail.amessage.info> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Jeremy" <jeremy@nospam.thanks.com> wrote:
> 
>
>If you were stupid enough to give your real name to any remailer you should

The first mailserver in your chain will always have your IP address. It is
unavoidable. That is why you must use at least 3 remailers, so the 3rd
doesn know your IP or the first remailer who might know, if he was used as
an injection point.

This person obviously must have used
eelbash/congo/busshwa/whatever/assholeus as an injection point, not knowing
that the remop has shown *****REPEATEDLY****** that he can't be trusted,
and that he truly believes that he is superior to the rest of us mere
mortals, and therefore knows better, despite the fact he is obviously
clueless.

"Duh, is mixmaster a server, or a client?"

I think we all knew someone like the asshoeus remop in high school...
getting the shit beat out of him after school every day the people he was
superior to.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Max Mustermann <anonymous@remail.amessage.info> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Jeremy" <jeremy@nospam.thanks.com> wrote:
> 
>
>If you were stupid enough to give your real name to any remailer you should

The first mailserver in your chain will always have your IP address. It is
unavoidable. That is why you must use at least 3 remailers, so the 3rd
doesn know your IP or the first remailer who might know, if he was used as
an injection point.

This person obviously must have used
eelbash/congo/busshwa/whatever/assholeus as an injection point, not knowing
that the remop has shown *****REPEATEDLY****** that he can't be trusted,
and that he truly believes that he is superior to the rest of us mere
mortals, and therefore knows better, despite the fact he is obviously
clueless.

"Duh, is mixmaster a server, or a client?"

I think we all knew someone like the asshoeus remop in high school...
getting the shit beat out of him after school every day the people he was
superior to.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Jeremy" wrote:
>All I know is that when I once posted via Eelbash, he actually used my REAL
>name and email address when he posted it to the newsgroup!
>
>It seemed to me that he was baiting people, only to embarrass them by not
>shielding their names and email addresses when their message was put onto
>the newsgroups.
>
>I wouldn't touch his service again.

Some of what I'm about to say regarding Eeelbash/Assholeus's orations is
so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I
apologize in advance. Some background is in order: Eeelbash/Assholeus's
vassals are too lazy to comment on Eeelbash/Assholeus's publicity
stunts. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public
teats, and casually forget that Eeelbash/Assholeus is extraordinarily
brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness
to repeat the mistakes of the past sets a new world record for
brazenness. He is proposing a cure for which there is no disease or,
more likely, a disease for which there is no cure. The denial of this
fact only proves the effrontery, and also the stupidity, of craven,
demented moral weaklings. In contrast, the only weapons
Eeelbash/Assholeus has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning,
brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it.

I definitely believe that we should condemn -- without hesitation,
without remorse -- all those who perpetuate the nonsense known
technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy, and I have formalized
my commitment to this high ideal by ensuring that I always test the
assumptions that underlie his perceptions. He constantly insists that
the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. But he
contradicts himself when he says that newspapers should report only on
items he agrees with. Eeelbash/Assholeus is capable of only two things,
namely whining and underhanded tricks. Next time, Eeelbash/Assholeus,
you may want to check your facts correctly. Also let me just say that
his fans' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not
free because they dare not be. He will probably never understand why he
scares me so much. And Eeelbash/Assholeus does scare me: His ultimata
are scary, his prank phone calls are scary, and most of all, his list of
sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here.
Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by
stating that the baneful nature of Eeelbash/Assholeus's ruses is not
just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.

For proof of this ongoing tragedy, one has only to realize that we can
all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone
is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come
true, but we've all heard Eeelbash/Assholeus yammer and whine about how
he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Many people who follow his
allegations have come to the erroneous conclusion that his ploys are a
breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. The
stark truth of the matter is that Eeelbash/Assholeus claims that his
lamentations prevent smallpox. I feel that the absurdities within that
claim speak for themselves, although I should add that the poisonous
wine of sexism had been distilled long before Eeelbash/Assholeus entered
the scene. Eeelbash/Assholeus is merely the agent decanting the
poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. If
I were to compile a list of Eeelbash/Assholeus's forays into espionage,
sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even
run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every
sane person who has passed the age of six realize that
Eeelbash/Assholeus's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the
truth, but only imprudent answers, gin-swilling resolutions to
conflicts.

We must stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be
supported by those facts in such as way that there is nothing
Eeelbash/Assholeus can do about it except learn to live with the fait
accompli. There are different ways of reconciling oneself to this
unpleasant, yet truly scornful, fact. Some people see nothing at all, or
rather, want to see nothing. Others are perfectly well aware of the
anti-democratic consequences which this plague must and will some day
induce, but only shrug their shoulders, convinced that nothing can be
done, so the only thing to do is to leave things alone. I don't mean to
scare you, but he is out to mold the mind of virtually every citizen --
young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated. And when we play
his game, we become accomplices. His claim that he has mystical powers
of divination and prophecy is not only an attack on the concept of
objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. Eeelbash/Assholeus's true
goal is to defy the rules of logic. All the statements that his pals
make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do
nothing to shatter the adage that Eeelbash/Assholeus is a perpetual
victim of injustice.

Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that every time he tries,
Eeelbash/Assholeus gets increasingly successful in his attempts to help
addlepated fugitives evade capture by the authorities. This dangerous
trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as
well. I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the
world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive
number of people who realize that we mustn't tolerate the likes of
Eeelbash/Assholeus. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that
he claims that black is white and night is day. That claim illustrates a
serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his magic-bullet
explanations. Then again, perhaps one day we will live in a world where
good people are not troubled by fear of unconscionable arrogant-types.
Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that given the
amount of misinformation that Eeelbash/Assholeus is circulating, I must
unequivocally point out that today, we might have let him pit the haves
against the have-nots. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will delegitimize
Eeelbash/Assholeus.

Eeelbash/Assholeus likes effusions that replace intellectual integrity
with chauvinistic sloganeering. Could there be a conflict of interest
there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that I don't want to build castles
in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But
I do want to offer a framework for discussion so that we can more
quickly reach a consensus, because doing so clearly demonstrates how I
don't need to tell you that he likes to have difficult social issues
presented to him in simple, black-and-white terms. That should be
self-evident. What is less evident is that in order to convince us that
the moon is made of green cheese, Eeelbash/Assholeus often turns to the
old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely
dissimilar causes. It has been revealed that Eeelbash/Assholeus plans to
portray superficial deviants as fiends. First reaction yields that his
lickspittles do not accept the fact that ignoring the problem of
gangsterism will not make it go away. A little more thought leads to the
more accurate conclusion that Eeelbash/Assholeus's reasoning is circular
and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with
his conclusion (e.g., that there should be publicly financed centers of
pharisaism) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- he always arrives at
that very conclusion.

What supercilious thing is he going to do next? Teach the next
generation how to hate -- and whom to hate? Encumber the religious idea
with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion
into a totally unnecessary conflict with science? Precipitate riots? In
any case, I apologize for giving Eeelbash/Assholeus these ideas, but
those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to expand people's
understanding of his antisocial disquisitions have no right to complain
when he and his devotees bowdlerize all unfavorable descriptions of his
imprecations.

Have you ever stopped to consider the enormous havoc and ruin that has
been wrought in this world by him and his secret police? I have. That's
why I say that any rational argument must acknowledge this.
Eeelbash/Assholeus's deplorable bromides, naturally, do not. If the mass
news media were actually in the business of covering news rather than
molding public attitudes to make us all miserable, they would really
report that one of Eeelbash/Assholeus's forces once said,
"Eeelbash/Assholeus would sooner give up money, fame, power, and
happiness than perform a contumelious act." Now that's pretty funny, of
course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I
included it to convince you that I can reword my point as follows. In
every country, there are stingy energumens who are every bit as
hypersensitive as Eeelbash/Assholeus.

There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the
evil deeds of evil people like Eeelbash/Assholeus. Even without the
hateful ideology of nativism in the picture, we can still say that I,
for one, unquestionably feel that he has insulted everyone with even the
slightest moral commitment. Eeelbash/Assholeus obviously has none, or he
wouldn't cause an increase in disease, vandalism, crime, and vice. As
one commentator put it, I recently overheard a couple of effete nutters
say that his vices are the only true virtues. Here, again, we encounter
the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this
Eeelbash/Assholeus-induced era of slogans and propaganda.

Most of you reading this post have your hearts in the right place. Now
follow your hearts with actions. There is little doubt that obdurate
saboteurs don't think like you and me. Am I being too harsh for writing
that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point
through to Eeelbash/Assholeus. As I remove the veil of ignorance I have
lived behind, I find that he can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It
could be worse, I suppose. Eeelbash/Assholeus could leave a generation
of people planted in the mud of a flighty, egocentric world, to begin a
new life in the shadows of credentialism. Until we address this issue,
we will never move beyond it.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Max Mustermann" wrote:
>In addition to this arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the
>delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
>breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
>
>This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
>his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
>to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
>political correctness.
>
>Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
>well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
>despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant, bald-faced
>LIE).
>
>So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
>and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
>Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
>He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
>remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
>
>So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
>being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
>
>His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
>you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
>filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
>are:
>
>eelbash
>axloltl
>axolotl2
>cheshire
>congo
>bog
>bogg
>eelbash (again)
>bushwa
>greatwall
>asmodeus

There are a number of things I can't stand about Eeelbash/Assholeus, and
I would just love to share them with you. Before I launch into my rant,
permit me the prelude caveat that it's not a question of if but only of
when Eeelbash/Assholeus will besmirch the memory of some genuine
historic figures. We can therefore extrapolate that he is careless with
data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any
real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't
seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases,
gets into all sorts of narrow-minded speculation, and then makes no
effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list!
Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to grant people the
freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills,
talent, and interest have no right to complain when he and his deputies
destroy our moral fiber. It would stand to reason that the point at
which you discover that Eeelbash/Assholeus's fibs, like opium, hashish,
or alcohol, keep the canaille in a trance and oblivious of reality is
not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a
determination that his statements such as "Eeelbash/Assholeus can absorb
mana by devouring his nemeses' brains" indicate that we're not all
looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily
verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.

To be fair, almost every day, he outreaches himself in setting new
records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's indubitably breathtaking
to watch him. If Eeelbash/Assholeus believes that every word that leaves
his mouth is teeming with useful information, then it's obvious why he
thinks that his generalizations are Right with a capital R. His most
egocentric tactic is to fabricate a phony war between brainless vermin
and primitive chuckleheads. This way, Eeelbash/Assholeus can subjugate
both groups into helping him reduce human beings to the status of
domestic animals. I indisputably don't want that to happen, which is why
I'm telling you that Eeelbash/Assholeus has nothing but contempt for
you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform
you that his eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And
Eeelbash/Assholeus's vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing.
(Remember his theory that granting him complete control over our lives
is as important as breathing air?) I want to give people more
information about Eeelbash/Assholeus, help them digest and assimilate
and understand that information, and help them draw responsible
conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I definitely hope people
draw: If we contradict Eeelbash/Assholeus, we are labelled oleaginous,
shabby reavers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.
Essentially, if he wants to generate alienation and withdrawal, let him
wear the opprobrium of that decision.

It's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about Eeelbash/Assholeus
and about hypothetical solutions to our Eeelbash/Assholeus problem. It's
an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that he
just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I
just want to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding neopaganism."
He claims that his activities are on the up-and-up. This is a very
witless and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways.
Should we be concerned that Eeelbash/Assholeus wants to topple society?
I'll answer that question for you: Yes, we should undoubtedly be
concerned, because if everyone does his own, small part, together we can
educate the public on a range of issues.

He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his dissertations sound like
they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the
brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
Without a doubt, however, Eeelbash/Assholeus can get away with lies
(e.g., that he is a model citizen), because the average person cannot
imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will
actually check out the facts for himself and discover that
Eeelbash/Assholeus is lying. I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle
to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I
consistently answer by saying that once you understand his snow jobs,
you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to
understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the
sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Eeelbash/Assholeus have a
serious destabilizing effect on our institutions. People who are
attacked by illaudable wheeler-dealers basically have three options.
They can ignore the attacks, engage the attackers in a debate, or apply
some sanction which will put an end to the attack.

Eeelbash/Assholeus obviously didn't have to pass an intelligence test to
get to where he is today, because his knowledge of how things work is
completely off the mark. First of all, his surrogates all look like him,
think like him, act like him, and endorse a complete system of
leadership by mobocracy, just like Eeelbash/Assholeus does. And all this
in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight --
brotherhood and service. Ha! If, five years ago, I had described a
person like Eeelbash/Assholeus to you and told you that in five years,
he'd stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest,
you'd have thought me cranky. You'd have laughed at me and told me it
couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has
happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how my
current plan is to fight the good fight. Yes, Eeelbash/Assholeus will
draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but
there may be nothing we can do to prevent him from making good on his
word to contaminate clear thinking with his sinful declamations. When we
compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by
his spokesmen, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive
dissonance". Our only recourse is to lay out some ideas and
interpretations that hold the potential for insight. Now, I, not being
one of the many evil randy-types of this world, am all for freedom of
speech, but Eeelbash/Assholeus's list of sins is long and each one
deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe
each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that we can divide his
publications into three categories: irascible, temperamental, and
self-aggrandizing. Eeelbash/Assholeus has it all wrong; we must shatter
the adage that chauvinism is the key to world peace. Our children depend
on that.

If his mottos get any more larcenous, I expect they'll grow legs and
attack me in my sleep. And what about Eeelbash/Assholeus's helpers?
They, like Eeelbash/Assholeus, are pharisaical careerism-prone-types.
The best way to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the
present controversy is to study the problem and recommend corrective
action. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for
all of us.

However deep one delves into the citations and footnotes of his
projects, and however poised and "mainstream" Eeelbash/Assholeus's
apostles appear once challenged, there is no way to forget that
Eeelbash/Assholeus talks a lot about ruffianism and how wonderful it is.
However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for
something he's never defined? He doesn't want you to know the answer to
that question; he wants to ensure you don't expose injustice and
puncture prejudice. While he has a right to his opinion, he pompously
claims that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. That
sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.

Eeelbash/Assholeus has a deep conviction that might makes right. The
destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory,
or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth
plainly. He is still going around insisting that censorship could
benefit us. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that I
want to resolve a number of lingering problems. That may seem simple
enough, but he recently stated that pessimism is a noble goal. He said
that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing
a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because he yields
to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention.
Unfortunately, for Eeelbash/Assholeus, "attract attention" usually
implies "terrorize our youngsters". Astute observers have known for
years that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to
understanding why Eeelbash/Assholeus has always used animalism as his
moorings. My peers claim that Eeelbash/Assholeus's outbursts are a
spiritually destructive propaganda instrument aimed at our children.
While this is unquestionably true, I contend we must add that
Eeelbash/Assholeus wants to prosecute, sentence, and label people as
abhorrent, imperious slaves to fashion without the benefit of any
evidence whatsoever. Who does he think he is? I mean, he frequently
plays on our emotions. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a
single sentence: He is willing to promote truth and justice when it's
convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws
principle to the wind. So let me make it clear that Eeelbash/Assholeus's
viewpoints are propagandism reincarnate. I know you're wondering why I
just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that
Eeelbash/Assholeus should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour
and hog all the glory.

It would be nice to say that overweening, prurient exclusionism doesn't
exist anymore, but we all know that it does. Contrast, for example,
Eeelbash/Assholeus's platitudes with those of disaffected, unsympathetic
autocrats, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine)
contrast, take the view that the real question here is not, "In view of
Eeelbash/Assholeus's quasi-flighty writings, what does it make sense for
us to do now?". The real question is rather, "What is this
counter-productive, disrespectful fascination Eeelbash/Assholeus has
with priggism?" I could give you the answer now, but it would be more
productive for me first to inform you that someone has been giving
Eeelbash/Assholeus's brain a very thorough washing, and now
Eeelbash/Assholeus is trying to do the same to us. I don't know when
scapegoatism became chic, but I do not appreciate being labeled. No one
does. Nevertheless, he is consistently inconsistent. Of course, this
sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple:
Eeelbash/Assholeus's strictures reflect an era in which cultures or
attitudes different from one's own were dealt with through violence and
mistrust. If Eeelbash/Assholeus's devotees had even an ounce of
integrity, they would enable all people to achieve their potential as
human beings. While reading this post, you may have occasionally asked
yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point
exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come
up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the
following: Eeelbash/Assholeus's followers allege, after performing
shoddy research and utilizing threadbare scholarship, that a number of
their enemies are planning to promote the lie of separatism.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

> "Duh, is mixmaster a server, or a client?"

Both. Mixmaster is a server and a client.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Max Mustermann" <anonymous@remail.amessage.info> wrote in message
 news:05b9611e348399f762f77b78dbcf8b1c@re
mail.amessage.info...
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Jeremy" <jeremy@nospam.thanks.com> wrote:
> 
REAL[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
> If you were stupid enough to give your real name to any remailer you
should
> be stripped naked and stood up in the village square with a hunter orange
> XXXXTARD sign hanging around your neck so everybody could use you as an
> example of why it's not real smart to try and stop a running chain saw
with
> your genitals.
>
> Oh wait...... That's what you just did...... Thanks!
>

Was that remark meant to be funny, or are you just showing us how much of a
moron you are?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thanks for the Rant, I will use it elsewhere replacing "Eeelbash/Assholeus"
with names of other victims.
You sound like the same fag that frequently flamed frog for fun.


"lcs Mixmaster Remailer" <mix@anon.lcs.mit.edu> wrote in message
news:20040926230008.22312.qmail@nym.alias.net...
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, "Max Mustermann" wrote: 
the[vbcol=seagreen] 
and[vbcol=seagreen] 
used[vbcol=seagreen] 
as[vbcol=seagreen] 
was,[vbcol=seagreen] 
bald-faced[vbcol=seagreen] 
Death[vbcol=seagreen] 
"Bushwa".[vbcol=seagreen] 
only[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
> There are a number of things I can't stand about Eeelbash/Assholeus, and
> I would just love to share them with you. Before I launch into my rant,
> permit me the prelude caveat that it's not a question of if but only of
> when Eeelbash/Assholeus will besmirch the memory of some genuine
> historic figures. We can therefore extrapolate that he is careless with
> data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any
> real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't
> seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases,
> gets into all sorts of narrow-minded speculation, and then makes no
> effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list!
> Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to grant people the
> freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills,
> talent, and interest have no right to complain when he and his deputies
> destroy our moral fiber. It would stand to reason that the point at
> which you discover that Eeelbash/Assholeus's fibs, like opium, hashish,
> or alcohol, keep the canaille in a trance and oblivious of reality is
> not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a
> determination that his statements such as "Eeelbash/Assholeus can absorb
> mana by devouring his nemeses' brains" indicate that we're not all
> looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily
> verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.
>
> To be fair, almost every day, he outreaches himself in setting new
> records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's indubitably breathtaking
> to watch him. If Eeelbash/Assholeus believes that every word that leaves
> his mouth is teeming with useful information, then it's obvious why he
> thinks that his generalizations are Right with a capital R. His most
> egocentric tactic is to fabricate a phony war between brainless vermin
> and primitive chuckleheads. This way, Eeelbash/Assholeus can subjugate
> both groups into helping him reduce human beings to the status of
> domestic animals. I indisputably don't want that to happen, which is why
> I'm telling you that Eeelbash/Assholeus has nothing but contempt for
> you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform
> you that his eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And
> Eeelbash/Assholeus's vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing.
> (Remember his theory that granting him complete control over our lives
> is as important as breathing air?) I want to give people more
> information about Eeelbash/Assholeus, help them digest and assimilate
> and understand that information, and help them draw responsible
> conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I definitely hope people
> draw: If we contradict Eeelbash/Assholeus, we are labelled oleaginous,
> shabby reavers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.
> Essentially, if he wants to generate alienation and withdrawal, let him
> wear the opprobrium of that decision.
>
> It's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about Eeelbash/Assholeus
> and about hypothetical solutions to our Eeelbash/Assholeus problem. It's
> an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that he
> just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I
> just want to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding neopaganism."
> He claims that his activities are on the up-and-up. This is a very
> witless and unconstructive view and moreover, is wrong in many ways.
> Should we be concerned that Eeelbash/Assholeus wants to topple society?
> I'll answer that question for you: Yes, we should undoubtedly be
> concerned, because if everyone does his own, small part, together we can
> educate the public on a range of issues.
>
> He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his dissertations sound like
> they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the
> brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.
> Without a doubt, however, Eeelbash/Assholeus can get away with lies
> (e.g., that he is a model citizen), because the average person cannot
> imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will
> actually check out the facts for himself and discover that
> Eeelbash/Assholeus is lying. I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle
> to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I
> consistently answer by saying that once you understand his snow jobs,
> you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to
> understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the
> sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Eeelbash/Assholeus have a
> serious destabilizing effect on our institutions. People who are
> attacked by illaudable wheeler-dealers basically have three options.
> They can ignore the attacks, engage the attackers in a debate, or apply
> some sanction which will put an end to the attack.
>
> Eeelbash/Assholeus obviously didn't have to pass an intelligence test to
> get to where he is today, because his knowledge of how things work is
> completely off the mark. First of all, his surrogates all look like him,
> think like him, act like him, and endorse a complete system of
> leadership by mobocracy, just like Eeelbash/Assholeus does. And all this
> in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight --
> brotherhood and service. Ha! If, five years ago, I had described a
> person like Eeelbash/Assholeus to you and told you that in five years,
> he'd stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest,
> you'd have thought me cranky. You'd have laughed at me and told me it
> couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has
> happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how my
> current plan is to fight the good fight. Yes, Eeelbash/Assholeus will
> draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but
> there may be nothing we can do to prevent him from making good on his
> word to contaminate clear thinking with his sinful declamations. When we
> compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by
> his spokesmen, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive
> dissonance". Our only recourse is to lay out some ideas and
> interpretations that hold the potential for insight. Now, I, not being
> one of the many evil randy-types of this world, am all for freedom of
> speech, but Eeelbash/Assholeus's list of sins is long and each one
> deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe
> each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that we can divide his
> publications into three categories: irascible, temperamental, and
> self-aggrandizing. Eeelbash/Assholeus has it all wrong; we must shatter
> the adage that chauvinism is the key to world peace. Our children depend
> on that.
>
> If his mottos get any more larcenous, I expect they'll grow legs and
> attack me in my sleep. And what about Eeelbash/Assholeus's helpers?
> They, like Eeelbash/Assholeus, are pharisaical careerism-prone-types.
> The best way to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the
> present controversy is to study the problem and recommend corrective
> action. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for
> all of us.
>
> However deep one delves into the citations and footnotes of his
> projects, and however poised and "mainstream" Eeelbash/Assholeus's
> apostles appear once challenged, there is no way to forget that
> Eeelbash/Assholeus talks a lot about ruffianism and how wonderful it is.
> However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for
> something he's never defined? He doesn't want you to know the answer to
> that question; he wants to ensure you don't expose injustice and
> puncture prejudice. While he has a right to his opinion, he pompously
> claims that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. That
> sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.
>
> Eeelbash/Assholeus has a deep conviction that might makes right. The
> destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory,
> or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth
> plainly. He is still going around insisting that censorship could
> benefit us. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that I
> want to resolve a number of lingering problems. That may seem simple
> enough, but he recently stated that pessimism is a noble goal. He said
> that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing
> a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because he yields
> to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention.
> Unfortunately, for Eeelbash/Assholeus, "attract attention" usually
> implies "terrorize our youngsters". Astute observers have known for
> years that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to
> understanding why Eeelbash/Assholeus has always used animalism as his
> moorings. My peers claim that Eeelbash/Assholeus's outbursts are a
> spiritually destructive propaganda instrument aimed at our children.
> While this is unquestionably true, I contend we must add that
> Eeelbash/Assholeus wants to prosecute, sentence, and label people as
> abhorrent, imperious slaves to fashion without the benefit of any
> evidence whatsoever. Who does he think he is? I mean, he frequently
> plays on our emotions. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a
> single sentence: He is willing to promote truth and justice when it's
> convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws
> principle to the wind. So let me make it clear that Eeelbash/Assholeus's
> viewpoints are propagandism reincarnate. I know you're wondering why I
> just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that
> Eeelbash/Assholeus should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour
> and hog all the glory.
>
> It would be nice to say that overweening, prurient exclusionism doesn't
> exist anymore, but we all know that it does. Contrast, for example,
> Eeelbash/Assholeus's platitudes with those of disaffected, unsympathetic
> autocrats, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine)
> contrast, take the view that the real question here is not, "In view of
> Eeelbash/Assholeus's quasi-flighty writings, what does it make sense for
> us to do now?". The real question is rather, "What is this
> counter-productive, disrespectful fascination Eeelbash/Assholeus has
> with priggism?" I could give you the answer now, but it would be more
> productive for me first to inform you that someone has been giving
> Eeelbash/Assholeus's brain a very thorough washing, and now
> Eeelbash/Assholeus is trying to do the same to us. I don't know when
> scapegoatism became chic, but I do not appreciate being labeled. No one
> does. Nevertheless, he is consistently inconsistent. Of course, this
> sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple:
> Eeelbash/Assholeus's strictures reflect an era in which cultures or
> attitudes different from one's own were dealt with through violence and
> mistrust. If Eeelbash/Assholeus's devotees had even an ounce of
> integrity, they would enable all people to achieve their potential as
> human beings. While reading this post, you may have occasionally asked
> yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point
> exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come
> up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the
> following: Eeelbash/Assholeus's followers allege, after performing
> shoddy research and utilizing threadbare scholarship, that a number of
> their enemies are planning to promote the lie of separatism.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]