Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Unix and Linux reviews > Free Debian support > Debian Developers > Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Re: Frank Carmickle and Marco Paganini must die  
Sven Mueller


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-26-04 10:55 PM

Thomas Bushnell BSG [u] wrote on 24/09/2004 18:31:

> Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> writes: 
>
> Geez, you keep saying this.  Surely if there are many ways you could
> give me just one?  I really do know, I really have done the research;
> I've been using and programming IP for twenty years.  So this is, from
> an expect, a put-up-or-shut-up demand.  If you know a single reliable
> method, say it now.

In case anybody else would wonder:

Adam did _not_ mean anything like actual remote detection of wether an
IP address was assigned by DHCP, but rather those DUL-(black)lists
and/or certain name parts in the address's PTR record.

Really, very smart (not) of him not to rectify this misunderstanding
here on the list.

There doesn't seem to be any _reliable_ method of finding out wether an
IP address is assigned dynamically (or even detect wether it is assigned
by DHCP) short of asking the ISP (either through his reports to certain
DUL IP-lists, analyzing the PTR record or asking directly).

Problem is: Except for asking the ISP directly about a certain IP, these
methods aren't really reliable. For one, the DUL lists contain many
address spaces besides those (hosted and) reported by ISPs. Secondly,
quite a few ISPs assign IP addresses from a "dynamic" subnet statically
for a variety of reasons (though a similar variety of reasons make this
a bad idea, mostly because of those stupid DUL blacklists). And finally,
there are many IPs assigned dynamically (or used for NAT, which is
somewhat equivalent) but not listed in DUL blacklist. That last problem
is no problem to me, but it still exists.

Anyhow, I think we all have made our points clear, and this discussion
wandered pretty much OT, so this is my last post on the subject unless
there is a very good reason to post more (I don't see that coming
though), so if anyone would like to discuss all this in more detail, I
am happy to set up a seperate mailinglist for it or discuss off-list.

cu,
sven


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.or
g





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register