References:
<858bd3a9.0409261450.2e717da3@posting.google.com>

In article
<858bd3a9.0409261450.2e717da3@posting.google.com>
yardleymj@yahoo.ca (Michael Yardley) wrote:
>
> C

I'm coming to the same conclusion. This shit really
sucks. Never know when or if a post will get posted to
NGs. One remailer that works fine one day, either
quits working or disappears the next.
By the time you see my reply, you have probably
forgotten what the subject was, if you do indeed see
it.
Strangely, instead of improving the service, some are
going to great lengths to make it more complicated.
Like hashXXXXingcash, whatever the XXXX that is. Like
some nut is gonna spend his entire life flooding a
XXXXing NG. Why not go after that cocksucka, instead
of putting more stumbling blocks in the way of the end
user?
One thing is for damn sure, if they were selling this
shit, they would be in the poorhouse. They are so
unreliable, one would think the US Govt. is running
them.

I am in no way dissing QS, which works pretty good for
me. The problem comes after the article leaves QS, or
leaves my ISP, to be more correct.

I'm also not blaming remailers, who are doing it for
free, after all.
It's just a XXXXed up situation, and until someone
figures out a way to charge for it, make it halfass
simple, and make it work most of the time, it's a
pretty ridiculous affair.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]