Message in the XFree86 Log
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Unix and Linux reviews > Red Hat support > Red Hat General > Message in the XFree86 Log




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Message in the XFree86 Log  
Michael S. Androsov


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-28-04 08:29 AM

I have a Red Hat Linux 9 and receiving next message in XFree86 Log:
(ww) ATI (0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xf6000000, 0x800000).

What's the problem?

Michael S. Androsov
EXPOCENTR





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Message in the XFree86 Log  
Scott Lurndal


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
09-28-04 10:56 PM

androsov@expocentr.ru (Michael S. Androsov) writes:[vbcol=seagreen]
>I have a Red Hat Linux 9 and receiving next message in XFree86 Log:
>(ww) ATI (0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xf6000000, 0x800000).[/vbcol
]

What kind of processor?   XFree86 uses the MTRR registers to set the
video aperture memory to "write combining" type.  This allows the processor
to combine multiple writes before pushing the cache-line back to the
video processor.

This can happen generally because (1) your CPU doesn't support MTRR's  or
(2) all the available MTRR's are already used for other purposes (which
situation can arise when for example there are multiple discontigous
ranges of physical memory).  On linux, you can look at /proc/mtrr to
see the current usage.

$ cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
reg02: base=0xec000000 (3776MB), size=  64MB: write-combining, count=1
$

If your CPU doesn't support the MTRR, performance may degrade somewhat, but
functionally things should still be fine.

scott





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Message in the XFree86 Log  
Michael S. Androsov


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
10-16-04 02:28 AM

My processor is Intel Pentium 4 (two processors in server). Follow is
output of cat command:
eg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
reg01: base=0x400020000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg02: base=0x400040000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg03: base=0x400060000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg04: base=0x400080000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg05: base=0x4000a0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg06: base=0x4000c0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
reg07: base=0x4000e0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1

Michael S. Androsov
EXPOCENTR



scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote in message news:<Jsi6d.3931$nj.2793@newssvr13.news
.prodigy.com>...
> androsov@expocentr.ru (Michael S. Androsov) writes: 
>
> What kind of processor?   XFree86 uses the MTRR registers to set the
> video aperture memory to "write combining" type.  This allows the processo
r
> to combine multiple writes before pushing the cache-line back to the
> video processor.
>
> This can happen generally because (1) your CPU doesn't support MTRR's  or
> (2) all the available MTRR's are already used for other purposes (which
> situation can arise when for example there are multiple discontigous
> ranges of physical memory).  On linux, you can look at /proc/mtrr to
> see the current usage.
>
> $ cat /proc/mtrr
> reg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
> reg02: base=0xec000000 (3776MB), size=  64MB: write-combining, count=1
> $
>
> If your CPU doesn't support the MTRR, performance may degrade somewhat, bu
t
> functionally things should still be fine.
>
> scott





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Message in the XFree86 Log  
Scott Lurndal


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
10-16-04 02:28 AM

androsov@expocentr.ru (Michael S. Androsov) writes:
>My processor is Intel Pentium 4 (two processors in server). Follow is
>output of cat command:
>eg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
>reg01: base=0x400020000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg02: base=0x400040000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg03: base=0x400060000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg04: base=0x400080000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg05: base=0x4000a0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg06: base=0x4000c0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>reg07: base=0x4000e0000 (16384MB), size=  64KB: uncachable, count=1
>
>Michael S. Androsov
>EXPOCENTR

Strassvichya.

Something else  on your system is using all of the
MTRR registers.   (Note that regs 1-7 contain mappings to 64k
chunks of memory starting at 2GB.  It appear that these are mapped
every 128k.   Do you have some custom hardware on this system?
These are rather unusual mappings.

There are only 8 registers, so when X.org/XF86 tries to set up
a write-combining region for the AGP aperature, it fails.  The
only consequence of that failure will be reduced graphics performance.

scott







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Message in the XFree86 Log  
Michael S. Androsov


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
10-16-04 02:28 AM

Hello!
My server is Compaq (HP) ProLiant DL380 with 2 GB RAM and hardware
RAID 5X72 Gb. This server is file server. I'm stopped other services.
Some personnels access to this server across SSH telnet session. Rest
users access this server with Samba service.
That's all about this server.

Michael S. Androsov
EXPOCENTR


scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote in message news:<HCBbd.13139$nj.206@newssvr13.news
.prodigy.com>...
> androsov@expocentr.ru (Michael S. Androsov) writes: 
>
> Strassvichya.
>
>   Something else  on your system is using all of the
> MTRR registers.   (Note that regs 1-7 contain mappings to 64k
> chunks of memory starting at 2GB.  It appear that these are mapped
> every 128k.   Do you have some custom hardware on this system?
> These are rather unusual mappings.
>
> There are only 8 registers, so when X.org/XF86 tries to set up
> a write-combining region for the AGP aperature, it fails.  The
> only consequence of that failure will be reduced graphics performance.
>
> scott





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register