I plan to run my own home business and I would like to set up a Sun Solaris
VPN server for some of my clients to connect in.  The problem is that all of
my clients and my computer are behind firewall/NAT (handled by router) with
dynamic IP.  Can anyone give me some advices about this issue?  All clients
are running either Windows 2000 Professional or Windows XP
Home/Professional.



+-------+           +--------+                        INTERNET
+--------+                        +-----------------------+
| Client |  ------  | Router
------------------------------------------------ | Router
| ------------+--- | Sun Solaris 9           |
+-------+           +--------+ (Dynamic IP)                         (Dynamic
IP) +--------+                |        |   IPSec VPN Server |

(Dynamic DNS host name:           |       +------------------------+

vpn.<somename>.no-ip.com)  +-------------+

|

|

+--------------+

|  Other PCs  |

+--------------+
--
==================================
Live Long and Prosper

Hsien-Cheng Li

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I haven't done yet and plan to do so .

"Mike Drechsler - SPAM PROTECTED EMAIL"
<mike-newsgroup@-DELETETHISPART-.upcraft.com> ???
news:8E37d.325447$yk.55140@news.easynews.com ???...
> Hsien-Cheng Li ??? wrote: 
Solaris[vbcol=seagreen] 
all of[vbcol=seagreen] 
with[vbcol=seagreen] 
clients[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
> This can work.
>
> Is there any specific question?
> Have you tried to implement this or are you just fishing for the
> experience of others?
>
> --
> WARNING!  Email address has been altered for spam resistance.
> Please remove the -deletethispart-. section before replying directly.
> Mike Drechsler (mike-newsgroup@-deletethispart-.upcraft.com)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Mike -
researching the same idea....
If we are using the classic dynamic IP from a DSL or Cable connection,
then how do we target the VPN remote address ?
I'm guessing we would have to also install a dynamic DNS client service
that would register our changing IP address -

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]