Does any one know the reason for the following BixDesk message:
"Business Desk must be run from the installed shortcut"

I am running Commerce Server 2000 SP3 and the client machine is running
Windows XP SP2.

--
Scott Glover

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

See if this link solves your problem
http://www.talkaboutsoftware.com/gr...rceserver.busin
essdesk/messages/3362.html

--------------------
Thread-Topic: Business Desk must be run from the installed shortcut
thread-index: AcSnvAZorf4C2XoTRRu0m4F4ooVcgQ==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 24.186.195.96
From: examnotes <ScottGlover@discussions.microsoft.com>
Subject: Business Desk must be run from the installed shortcut
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:39:07 -0700
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <6D045C2C-DEC8-4114-A1C0-7C0C4E061F45@microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.commerceserver.businessdesk
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.commerceserver.businessdesk:6437
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.commerceserver.businessdesk

Does any one know the reason for the following BixDesk message:
"Business Desk must be run from the installed shortcut"

I am running Commerce Server 2000 SP3 and the client machine is running
Windows XP SP2.

--
Scott Glover


Thanks
Vinayak Tadas
Microsoft
http://blogs.msdn.com/vinayakt

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use. © 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights
reserved.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
Get Secure!  For more info visit http://www.microsoft.com/security.  Please
reply to the newsgroups only.  Thanks

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]