10-03-04 02:07 AM
I am not sure of the ports used by named pipes, I think you need the rpc
netbios ports open (136,137), but named pipes are not an internet
application, rather they use the net api AFAIK.
To set the crawl/interactive account you should expand your catalog in the
IS MMC, expand the directories folder and delete the problem folder. Then
return to the catalog folder, and right click on the directories folder and
select new directory. Specify the account here. Ensure it has rights to
access the files and folders and logon interactively.
I really can't answer your questions about the underlying ports used by IS
other than what I have seen using filemon. You should be able to use a
sniffer to capture a trace and analyze that to determine which ports are
involved.
It seems to me that there are two seperate processes 1) the query which is
done against the local catalog, 2) the indexing process which is done
through the cidaemon component. Win2k and above allows for remote
notifications. I have no idea what ports are involved here.
--
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Jetlt (jay)" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0fac01c4a860$60e4ca30$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> Hi hilary,,
>
> Thank you very much....
>
> I can log on to remote m/c (jack2) from Explorer. So why
> can't from application.
>
> named pipes are created by givin name like
> \\.\pipe\<name>, But \\ must use some kind of port to
> communicate with remote machine.
>
> By the way, How Can I enable interactive logon account??
> I mean from Where i can do this......
>
>
> Any Other way of doing this is??
>
>
> I am useing MS VC application to make queris to IS... In
> that i can give multiple machines in Setting Scopes by
> OLEDB providers API.
> So my ques is
>
> How does this takled by IS.?
> In this case Any port sharing involved?/
>
> As my network is not allow me to share any ports other
> than used by some other application....
>
> Thanks In Advance..
>
> Jay.
>
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|