Hi Alan,

good point. I will do some testing with the MQ series adapter and post the
results either here or in my blog.

regards
Lars

"Alan Smith" <AlanSmith@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D8FFBF1E-0B49-4BC4-BC1B-B75229215E6D@microsoft.com...
> Hi Again Lars,
>
> Sounds like you have enough RAM there. I agree, it is strange that the
> orchestration is dehydrating with every message, it does not seem to be
the
> optimal way to process the messages.
>
> Could this be related to the configuration of the MQ receive location? I
> have not worked much with MQ and BizTalk, but I think you can configure
the
> batch size, polling interval, and other properties. This may speed up the
> process of retrieving the messages from the MQ queue, and publishing them
in
> the massage box database. If the messages arrive more quickly, the
> orchestration may not dehydrate so oftern. (You can track the messages
> received in PerfMon.)  Let me know if this has any effect, I would be keen
to[vbcol=seagreen]
> learn more about MQ.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> "Lars W. Andersen" wrote:
> 
dehydrated,[vbcol=seagreen] 
dehydrates[vbcol=seagreen] 
(with[vbcol=seagreen] 
[vbcol=seagreen] 
basis[vbcol=seagreen] 
nice[vbcol=seagreen] 
it[vbcol=seagreen] 
dehydrate[vbcol=seagreen] 
when[vbcol=seagreen] 
orchestration on[vbcol=seagreen] 
messages[vbcol=seagreen] 
rehydrates[vbcol=seagreen] 
use[vbcol=seagreen] 
=[vbcol=seagreen] 
=[vbcol=seagreen] 
this to[vbcol=seagreen] 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]