After installing SP-XP2 SQL-Adapter stopped,
I did configured gpedit.mmc RPC end point ... part to get BizTalk 2004 back
working,but when I call SP through SQl-Adpater get folloing error.
New transaction can not enlist in the specified transaction co-ordinator.

It used to work before I install this XP SP2...
I am sure this is configuration issue ,I tried giving extra open port using
Component services.but no effect.

Any clue??
Thanks in advacned...

Ashish Udas

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

This may be due to windows firewall blocked your MSDTC. You can fix it by
allowing MSDTC in your firewall settings. see this blog post for a quick fix
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jly...8/23/23022.aspx

--
Balaji Thiagarajan
MCP (BizTalk)
http://biztalkbits.blogspot.com

--
"Ashish Udas" <ashishudas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:etB7$eWtEHA.1220@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> After installing SP-XP2 SQL-Adapter stopped,
> I did configured gpedit.mmc RPC end point ... part to get BizTalk 2004
back
> working,but when I call SP through SQl-Adpater get folloing error.
> New transaction can not enlist in the specified transaction co-ordinator.
>
> It used to work before I install this XP SP2...
> I am sure this is configuration issue ,I tried giving extra open port
using
> Component services.but no effect.
>
> Any clue??
> Thanks in advacned...
>
> Ashish Udas
>
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Yes I fixed this,also one more thing you need to enable network access for
DTC.

Thanks.

Ashish Udas
"Balaji Thiagarajan" <tbalaji_mcsd@hotmail.com.NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:uQOkl%23dtEHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> This may be due to windows firewall blocked your MSDTC. You can fix it by
> allowing MSDTC in your firewall settings. see this blog post for a quick
> fix
> http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/jly...8/23/23022.aspx
>
> --
> Balaji Thiagarajan
> MCP (BizTalk)
> http://biztalkbits.blogspot.com
>
> --
> "Ashish Udas" <ashishudas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:etB7$eWtEHA.1220@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... 
> back 
> using 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]