Re: .so v/s .dll
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Unix and Linux reviews > Free Unix support > Unix Programming > Re: .so v/s .dll




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Re: .so v/s .dll  
Paul Pluzhnikov


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
10-19-04 07:48 AM

opwv_pspl_test2@yahoo.com (K.M Jr) writes:

> UNIX DSOs == Dynamic Shared object Library, right ?

Right.

> Those that need dlopen(), dlsym().

No, you don't need to use dlopen() in order to use DSOs any more
then you need to use LoadLibrary() in order to use DLLs.

> So do we likewise need any switch for a UNIX DSOs so one can release
> memory allocated by the DSO ?

No, it works on UNIX without any special switches (which is the
point Chuck Dillon was trying to make, I think).

Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register