We have IAS running on a machine with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition
.  We have two IP addresses bound to this machine. The IAS service is gettin
g requests on x.x.x.2 (secondary address) and is responding on x.x.x.1 (prim
ary address).

We need it to respond on the address it gets the requests from.

Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

That's really a weird problem.

You can specify the port you want IAS to use for authentication or
accounting by using the format IP:Port. But this will allow IAS to send and
receive only from one of the IP's configured on the server

--
 ========================================
=====
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
 ========================================
=====

"esullender" <esullender.1ei09g@mail.webservertalk.com> wrote in message
news:esullender.1ei09g@mail.webservertalk.com...
>
> We have IAS running on a machine with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise
> Edition.  We have two IP addresses bound to this machine. The IAS
> service is getting requests on x.x.x.2 (secondary address) and is
> responding on x.x.x.1 (primary address).
>
> We need it to respond on the address it gets the requests from.
>
> Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> --
> esullender
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message442185.html
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Is that under the top-level IAS properties -> Ports? Nothing indicates that 
I can enter an IP here... just a list of ports.

quote:
Originally posted by Sam Salhi [MSFT] 
[B]That's really a weird problem.

You can specify the port you want IAS to use for authentication or
accounting by using the format IP:Port. But this will allow IAS to send and
receive only from one of the IP's configured on the server

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]