Jim Brock wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:48:10 GMT, Rich Teer
> <OOOO.OOOO@OOOO-OOOOO.OOO> wrote:
>
> I've converted all contact and product information in this
> spam to Os (numbers and letters).
>
> 
> <snip>
>
> You are a spammer.

By what definition?  I can think of two definitions for spam.  1)
multiple posting of off-topic information to an unnecessarily large set
of unrelated forums.  2) Unsoliticed email.

He's done neither.  He provided a valid, and potentially useful,
response to a request (i.e. solicited) for information.

> <snip>
>
> Need I point out to the OP and others that it would be a mistake
> to trust the information in a book written by someone that
> obviously lacks morals? ...

You can't be serious, ROTFLMAO...

You've got your own definition of morality as well as spam it appears.

-- ced

--
Chuck Dillon
Senior Software Engineer
NimbleGen Systems Inc.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]