Hamby Hutcheson wrote:

> "Now, what did you want to say again?"
>
> Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!
>
> I know those ... and a couple more (that are more fun to quote).
> Different time ... and different "PROBLEM" ("net etiquette" vs. "THE
> PROBLEM").
>
> Pay close attention Atro ... "Content Is The Issue"!
>
> Hamby Hutcheson
> Smart-Traveler.

Hamby/Homer/H I have a question for you & somewhat of a followup to my
post on this thread that mentioned the following:

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,86986,00.asp
http://news.com.com/The+quest+for+n...51.html

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/15284

where you were involved with the ZeoSync scam.

Do all of those government agencies & partners to smart-traveler.com
that you provide AMBER alerts & other services to realize your
background available at:

http://www.miami-dadeclerk.com/cjis...seinq=F85002737

Providing AMBER alerts is an admirable endevour...

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/amberalert/states.html

but one has to wonder how http://www.smart-traveler.info/ :

====
SMART-TRAVELER. and CODEAMBER.ORG

As a Public Service, Smart-Traveler. exclusively provides the Relay and
Forwarding of both E-Mail and Wireless Text based AMBER Alert Public
Service Messages for CodeAmber.org in addition to displaying the
real-time CodeAmber Alert Ticker on our State and City Pages.

Smart-Traveler. Management urges all Visitors to this site or recipients
of Smart-Traveler. E-Alerts to help the Federal and State AMBER Alert
Programs in their efforts to help OUR children by paying attention to
all AMBERAlerts, E-Alert Messages and Wireless Text Messages and carry
that attention with them when they are in their vehicles.
====

and codeamber.org (Registrant Name: Bighits.Com, Inc/Bryant Harper)
http://codeamber.org/ via unsolicited emails fit into the AMBER alert
picture.

SMART-TRAVELER. and CODEAMBER.ORG may indeed be providing a valuable
service to those that sign up for and REQUEST solicited emails from your
organizations, but continuing to deny that unsolicited AMBER alert
emails are OK is just plain wrong... even CODEAMBER.ORG states this in
their own convoluted way on their website (albeit with Topica known for
spam as a partner):

http://codeamber.org/email_alerts.html
====
Receive Amber Alerts via Email

The wonderful people at Topica.com are graciously donating their email
list management services to help us provide email Amber Alerts to
subscribers. The list will be used strictly for notifying you of Amber
Alerts. Your email address will never be shared with any third party and
you will not receive solicitations or advertising as a member of the list.
.
.
.
To help defray the server and administrative expense associated with
providing the CodeAmber ticker we are accepting donations through
PayPal. Every little bit helps and donations of $25 or more will be
recognized with an entry on our "Friends" page along with a link to your
site if you like.
====

Which implies that you must be a subscriber to receive these alerts. And
doesn't seem to fit with the statement "As a Public Service,
Smart-Traveler. exclusively provides the Relay and Forwarding of both
E-Mail and Wireless Text based AMBER Alert Public Service Messages for
CodeAmber.org".

Other related AMBER alert links:

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/amberalert...g_framework.pdf
http://www.chp.ca.gov/html/amber-en.html
http://www.bayareaamberalert.com/
http://www.bayareaamberalert.com/weblinks.html

In one of your previous posts you stated:

====
We have no objection to any individual or organization exersizing the
right to block a Smart-Traveler AMBER Alert (I'm sure the child's Mom
might feel otherwise) however, we object to 2 or more individuals or
organizations acting in concert to deny Smart-Traveler. the same
rights they demand for themselves.

These efforts run up upon FCC Regs, Anti-Trust Issues and possibly
RICO (not to mention slander and libel).
====

I'll go back to my original question:

Do all of those government agencies & partners to smart-traveler.com
that you provide AMBER alerts & other services to realize your
background available at:

http://www.miami-dadeclerk.com/cjis...seinq=F85002737

And given the information on that site are you sure that you really want
to state that blocking Smart-Traveler messages "run up upon FCC Regs,
Anti-Trust Issues and possibly RICO (not to mention slander and libel)"?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]