11-02-04 12:45 PM
q_ball_feedstop <q_ball_feedstop@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Several of the less intelligent morons in COLA think I am flatfish.
That hardly matters now.
In fact, the original definition of "flatfish" might as well be thrown out
of the window and a new one adopted.
Rather than just have "flatfish" as one person posting numerous and pathetic
trolls under different pseudonyms, which he what caused this flatfishitis in
the first place a new definition could be...
Flatfish (n, v) [1] (n) Originally one group of trolls who shared a
connection and posted as "flatfish", and then as a
multitude of nicknames.
[2] (n) One who crossposts to irrelevant groups, posting
trolls that have the same "style" (or "smell") as
the original flatty. And constantly complains about
people calling him flatfish of course.
[3] (v) To perform the act of posting in the style of
flatfish.
Assuming this redefinition gets adopted, nothing will change, it'll just be
slightly more accurate...
Happy now?
> Personally the only thing I know about flatfish is that it is feared
> in the COLA newsgroup and the very few posts I find seem to be from
> Optimum Online which from what I gather is a broadband or DSL
> connection not a dial up.
Fear? There is nothing to fear from a plaice. It just sits there, feeding
off the bottom. Irritation, maybe. But fear? ha!
> My connection is also broadband and is certainly not Optimum Online.
> So tell me, exactly, how do you arrive at this conclusion that I am
> flatfish?
The posting style of course, idiot. Flatfish went through phases, always
cross posting when he was in "troll" mode and always attacking things of
which it's obvious he'd never tried, or at least tried to ASK how to fix.
Some of the things s/h/it claimed were so totally bogus it is unimaginable
how they could've thought anyone would fall for it, some were edging close
to the truth, possibly enough to fool a casual reader. ALL of them were
crap. Just like the rest of the wintroll population here...
So, if you AREN'T flatfish, YOU prove it.
Post again with your critique of suse 9.2, but this time, each "problem" you
claim to have encountered... GIVE SOME SMEGGIN DETAILS!
You've been tarred with the flatfish brush now, and it'll take a lot of
carbolic to get that off, your only hope is to not troll, post reasonable
well balanced posts and actually post details of the troubles you encounter
so those of us who know suse can help you fix it.
> I see multiple posts, from all over the world and all kinds of
> connections, including my own, attributed to flatfish.
Famed for using proxies and remote news servers was old flatty.
> Does this mental idiot operated from some ATT switching center or
> someplace where he can make all of these connections?
Never heard of something called telnet?
very useful little command, that, allows you to connect to servers
worldwide. I quite regularely connect to a sanfransisco server called
grex.
> Come on already, you retards are simply using a lame excuse and
> backing it up with other retards to fend off any potential attack on
> Linux.
Only from trolls, like yourself, who don't even try. BIG DEAL YOU HAD
PROBLEMS! Never bothered to try to solve them though did you? Bet you never
bothered to report them to suse either. Posting things like
"THIS IS SHIT, I HATE THIS, THIS AND THIS AND THIS DIDN'T WORK!" is hardly
constructive is it?
You're going to have to de-troll yourself and come up with some better posts
before anyone will treat you with respect in this or any other newsgroup.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|