Just posted code of an Posting event handler that leverages Active Directory
to send the notifications to the appropriate users.  Any feedback would be
greatly appreciated:

http://i2o.blogspot.com/2004/11/mcm...ing-active.html

Cheers,
Colin

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Colin,

seems to be similar to this one:
http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossne...2/21/44902.aspx

Cheers,
Stefan.

"Colin Bowern" <colinbowern@nospam.indimensions.com> wrote in message
news:OdWXvmz0EHA.3292@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Just posted code of an Posting event handler that leverages Active
Directory
> to send the notifications to the appropriate users.  Any feedback would be
> greatly appreciated:
>
> http://i2o.blogspot.com/2004/11/mcm...ing-active.html
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Stefan,

Cool, I didn't see that.  I will have to go through your blog a little more.


The main difference I see is the efficiency of the directory service use.
My code leverages the RootDSE object to local a global catalog server
instead of hard coding a domain name and then in turn through a single call
returns the list of email addresses.  But in the end, the same result is
achieved.

Cheers,
Colin

"Stefan [MSFT]" <stefang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OosKAg60EHA.1076@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi Colin,
>
> seems to be similar to this one:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/stefan_gossne...2/21/44902.aspx
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan.
>
> "Colin Bowern" <colinbowern@nospam.indimensions.com> wrote in message
> news:OdWXvmz0EHA.3292@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... 
> Directory 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Colin,

I implemented your version on one of our servers but finally ended up
hardcoding as the performance of the GC query was not good enough for our
requirments.

Cheers,
Stefan.


"Colin Bowern" <colinbowern@nospam.indimensions.com> wrote in message
news:uQ#96I$0EHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Cool, I didn't see that.  I will have to go through your blog a little
more.
> 
>
> The main difference I see is the efficiency of the directory service use.
> My code leverages the RootDSE object to local a global catalog server
> instead of hard coding a domain name and then in turn through a single
call
> returns the list of email addresses.  But in the end, the same result is
> achieved.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
> "Stefan [MSFT]" <stefang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:OosKAg60EHA.1076@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... 
http://i2o.blogspot.com/2004/11/mcm...ing-active.html[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Stefan,

The GC is supposed to handle that sort of operation without breaking a
sweat.  Are your using the corp net GCs or do you have one in a lab? I would
probably raise that with ADSI team as they would most likely be interested
in seeing the performance issues behind that.  I can't recall the name of
the contact at the moment, but you'll be able to find their page on the
product group's page on corp net if it's still up.

Cheers,
Colin

"Stefan [MSFT]" <stefang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:emwTTi$0EHA.3408@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Colin,
>
> I implemented your version on one of our servers but finally ended up
> hardcoding as the performance of the GC query was not good enough for our
> requirments.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan.
>
>
> "Colin Bowern" <colinbowern@nospam.indimensions.com> wrote in message
> news:uQ#96I$0EHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... 
> more. 
> call 
> http://i2o.blogspot.com/2004/11/mcm...ing-active.html
 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Colin,

I was using a Corpnet GC.

Cheers,
Stefan

"Colin Bowern" <colinbowern@nospam.indimensions.com> wrote in message
news:eUDWxtj1EHA.132@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Stefan,
>
> The GC is supposed to handle that sort of operation without breaking a
> sweat.  Are your using the corp net GCs or do you have one in a lab? I
would
> probably raise that with ADSI team as they would most likely be interested
> in seeing the performance issues behind that.  I can't recall the name of
> the contact at the moment, but you'll be able to find their page on the
> product group's page on corp net if it's still up.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
> "Stefan [MSFT]" <stefang@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:emwTTi$0EHA.3408@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... 
our[vbcol=seagreen] 
use.[vbcol=seagreen] 
is[vbcol=seagreen] 
http://i2o.blogspot.com/2004/11/mcm...ing-active.html[vbcol=seagreen] 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]