Hey Matt, thanks for the reply. Soooo "In-house tool" you say? How does it
work and how can I build my own version, I'd much rather have the schema tha
n
use the message assignment. Can you throw me a bone here?

-fs


"mjhs" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Francis, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner.
>
> Greg's approach is one of two that we have used. It precludes the usage of
 a
> schema. We also use an inhouse tool that can read the SOAP and generate th
e
> complex schema type that we need to use the transform to map our data. Thi
s
> streamlines the implementation of orchestrations.
>
> Glad to read that you got this resolved.
>
> "Francis Shanahan" wrote:
> 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]