12-16-04 11:26 PM
"Fatboy40" <no one here, sorry> wrote in message
news:41bffeef$0$93676$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Drink and Oracle, thanks for the offers
>
> I'm just really researching things at the moment. I'm moving the law firm
> that I work at to Exchange 2003 next year from our current e-mail system
and
> could probably include a SAN for it in the budget.
>
> At the moment I trying to find out as much info as I can as I've never
setup
> a SAN before, it seems quite straight forward really as long as you buy
> hardware that's compatible with one another.
>
> So far it either an EMC or HP SAN however we use Dell servers and it seems
> to be impossible to find info on using HP kit with Dell servers. I suppose
> it's just a case of buying the right hardware e.g. HP disk array/McData
> switches/Qlogic HBA's for example.
>
> I'd like to use EMC hardware as everyone I know who uses it says it's
easily
> the best however I do have to consider the price (I could save money going
> for a SATA SAN but there's no way I'd reccomend that solution to any
serious
> business).
ATA is tier-2 storage. That being said, and since we are on a beer budget,
we
have purchased a lot of ATA storage this last year and a half to be topped
off
with 30TB more by the end of the month. We chew up disk storage like crazy.
They have more issues than fibre drives but since we have a good support
contract
we have had good results.
We have just purchased and EMC CX700 w/ 30TB of ATA. We have been
testing a CX500 for the last 3 months in our environment and found it fast
and
reliable. We lost one drive early on-not bad for a SAN that lives being
beaten
up 24x7.
--
Wolf
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please post all responses to UseNet. All email cheerfully and automagically
routed to Dave Null
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|