12-17-04 07:45 AM
"Lyman" <Lyman@hush.ai> wrote in message
news:1103244266.127167@youngsonsinc.com...
> Hello all,
>
> PLEASE, can you tell me how secure I am ?
>
> I have DCCP plus, all drives encrypted. ADDAWARE, ANTIVIRUS, TDS3 disabled
> Java and ACTIVE X.
>
> I have a PRIVACY.LI account that proxied all my ports ( HTTP and POP3 and
> SMTP) :
>
> I MUST use OUTLOOK but instead of POP3 server and SMTP server I write
> localhost ( The POP3 server and SMTP server are proxied by PUTTY ) with
> account offered by privacy.li.
> Since OUTLOOK is not secure I added a module that let me receive only
plain
> text and remove any atachaments.
> I enabled rules in ZONEALARM this program (O2K) that let connection from
> OUTLOOK to <DESTINATION: localhost> allowing SMTP AND POP 3 PROTOCOLS
only
> directed to localhost ( localhost:25 and localhost:110).
> This way I am sure everything that leaves OUTLOOK and also coming into
> OUTLOOK (checking POP3 emails logs) will be proxied by PRIVACY.LI service
> ( conection can go only to localhost and ports specified by me)
> Any other connection are forbiden from OUTLOOK. This should secure OUTLOOK
> right ?
>
>
> For browsers OPERA AND FIREFOX also used localhost and also enabled rules
in
> ZONEALARM that will not allow browsers to connect directly to internet
other
> than trough localhost.
>
> So nothing from my computer does not leave directly to internet than
passing
> trough SSH ACCOUNT ( localhost from privacy.li)
>
> Can you tell me how secure I am ?
>
> Normally browsing web should be secured by PRIVACY. Also since I proxied
my
> ( POP3 and SMTP) my email account provider can not ever tell from logs
> where exactly I am from ( they see privacy.li hosts)
>
> I am thinking to get a second acccount to PRIVACY. LI ( I am very pleased
> how service and support work, never down never problems) and chaining the
> first proxy trough second proxy.
>
> This should offer me good privacy RIGHT ? Like ONION.. ? For both HTTP
and
> EMAIL accounts.
>
>
> I AM SECURE WITH THIS SETUP or do I need to drop off everything and start
> over using TOR PRIVOXY QUICKSILVER ?
>
> My main problem is that I MUST use OUTLOOK (cant explain cuz would be too
> long) but if my setup does not offer privacy I drop off everything and
> start over using TOR PRIVOXY QUICKSILVER
>
> Can I use a SMTP server offered by some remailer and set-up my OUTLOOK in
> any way so I can send anonymous messages with outlook ? if I am not secure
> with my set-up ?
>
> Any reply will be greatly appreciated
>
> Thank you
> Lyman
>
> PS: I also got a SSH account at METROPIPE, they told me before paying will
> proxy POP3 and SMTP then after I bought told me is in work but never
worked
> for SMTP AND POP3. The HTTP from METROPIPE is little faster (not
> considerably) than PRIVACY HTTP but lacks of options for Metropipe make me
> think is not so great. Maybe depends of what you have in mind.
> PRIVACY.LI is much better service than METROPIPE and more complete IMHO.
>
> --
> newsSPAM@cats.cotse.net
>
> (remove word SPAM to email me)
>
corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Lyman" <Lyman@hush.ai>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: How Secure I am ? please tell me...
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:44:19 +0200
Organization: http://www.ldproxy.com
Message-ID: <1103244266.127167@youngsonsinc.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Cache-Post-Path: youngsonsinc.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 75
It says your posting from http://youngsonsinc.com/ ?? via supernews no
iP. Check you IP on someother internet sites GRC?
Java script off right? active x off too.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
