Win98 to samba printer kills smbd on ES 3.0
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Unix and Linux reviews > Red Hat support > Red Hat Topics > Win98 to samba printer kills smbd on ES 3.0




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Win98 to samba printer kills smbd on ES 3.0  
Bob Meyers


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
12-18-04 01:45 AM

I have an ES 3.0 kernel 2.4.21-4.ELsmp with samba version 3.0.2-6.3E that
has been running flawlessly for past 6 months, but has recently started
crashing smbd processes when a Windows 98 user tries to print to a shared
printer on the server. /var/log/messages reports the crash something like
this example:

Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]: [2004/12/16 07:16:43, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   ==================================
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]: [2004/12/16 07:16:43, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 3593
(3.0.2-6.3E)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   Please read the appendix Bugs of the S
amba
HOWTO collection
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]: [2004/12/16 07:16:43, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   ==================================
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]: [2004/12/16 07:16:43, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1422)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   PANIC: internal error
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]: [2004/12/16 07:16:43, 0]
lib/util.c:smb_panic(1430)
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:   BACKTRACE: 15 stack frames:
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #0 smbd(smb_panic+0x13f) [0x801a6
08f]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #1 smbd [0x80191b48]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #2 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0xb725fc08
]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #3 smbd(print_queue_status+0x186)
[0x801c7246]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #4 smbd [0x8004eca3]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #5 smbd(api_reply+0x1cf) [0x80055
d4f]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #6 smbd [0x8004bdae]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #7 smbd(reply_trans+0x5ab) [0x800
4c53b]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #8 smbd [0x800901f0]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #9 smbd [0x80090403]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #10 smbd(process_smb+0xa6) [0x800
90656]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #11 smbd(smbd_process+0x192) [0x8
00913d2]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #12 smbd(main+0x505) [0x8021d345]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #13
/lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf8) [0xb724d748]
Dec 16 07:16:43 sch smbd[3593]:    #14 smbd [0x80035a32]

The Windows 98 user only sees a printer-not-available error message. There
are a few Windows XP's that still print to the printer without crash or
error.

I have not run up2date on this server in past 5 months, so I'm sure there
are many updates. I am resorting to see if updating the OS will resolve
issue. Is it a slam-dunk to run up2date when it hasn't been run in a while?
I've done a lot of elimination test/trials, add/remove printer,
virus-checks, etc.
Any ideas appreciated.







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register