01-23-04 09:53 PM
Did you try to fix this partition using the fsck command.
fsck /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0
See the manpage for fsck, you may need use -o b=32 option to correct
some superblock problems. the -N option will show you all alternative
superblocks to use.
"phongle" <phongle_1959@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
15da5e75.0306271859.58009f31@posting.google.com...quote:
> Hi,
> Recently, I have configured my ES-250 Sun Enterprise server to mirror
> the two disks using Solstice 4.2 (OS 8)
> I was able to mirror the two disks (c0t0d0s.. and c0t12d0s..)
> sucessfully.
> Each disk lay out as followed
> root s0
> usr s1
> swap s3
> opt s4
> home s5
> var s6
> unassigned s7 (is used to contain the state
> database)
>
> Everything was working fine until I decided to simulate by
> switch the drive and location of these.
> Upon powering off the system, I removed c0t0d0 and
> placed it in c0t8d0. I then removed c0t12d0
> (mirror)and placed it in c0t0d0 and then powering the
> system on, I can see the following
> Sun Enterprise 250 400MHZ
> OpenBoot 3.22 1024 MB Memory ...
> Ethernet Address 0:3:ba:.... Host ID ...
> Initialize memory
> Boot device: disk file and args:
> Then it just sit there, like it waiting for something.
> I waited and waited for hour and still nothing
> changed. I can see the power LED is on and that's
> the only LED is lid on the ES.-250, the other 5 LED is off.
>
> I tried to place the disks back to its original location and
> boot but it still failed, and resulted the same as mention above.
>
> Now, neither one of these disks (Primary and mirror) boot.
> I booted from CD and tried to mount the root by
> issuing this command
> # mount /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 /mnt
> and it said
> mount: no such device
> Mount: can not mount /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0
> I figured if I can mount the root then I can go in and modified
> the /etc/vfstab and boot w/o the SVM.
> My two questions are
> Does anyone know how I can mount this root partition?
> This is the only one I can't not mount.
> The other slices mount no problem at all.
>
> Phong
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|