Hi,

we have encountered some performance lugs when using MSMQT Receive Port.
We've submitted 1000 messages from MSMQ computer to BizTalk host runnig MSMQ
T
receive location and then performed the same test using FILE receive locatio
n
on a network shared folder with absolutelly the same messages. The result is
that FILE adapter is about 75% faster than MSMQT. Moreover in case of MSMQT
we see that BTS host processor load is going down occationally from 100% to
2-5% for about 15 sec (in this period queue length became the same and no
messages being process - no any activity) and then rise again to 100% while
processing these messages. In case of FILE adapter - processor load is
keeping about 100%.
Are there any special performance considerations of using MSMQT?

Best regards,
Vasily

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]