Transaction Types within a Orchestration
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > BizTalk Server > BizTalk Server General > Transaction Types within a Orchestration




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Transaction Types within a Orchestration  
beewil


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
02-23-05 10:58 PM

I can't find any documentation on the transaction type property with in an
Orchestration that explains what happens when it is set  to NONE.  Currently
I have it set to Long Running, but after reading the performance hit with
this setting I would like to change it.   I took out all of the scopes and
tried to change it to Atomic, but I receive an errors saying that I can't
have a send and receive port defined.

What happens if I set the Transaction type to NONE?  Is this a good
practice?  The orchestration is a real time call to the back end to get data
.
There is no reason for retry if it fails and there is code that checks the
return messages's status for error handling.
--
chris wilper





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Transaction Types within a Orchestration  
Bill Ticehurst


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
02-23-05 10:58 PM

Hi Chris,

If you don't have any transaction scopes defined in your orchestration and
aren't using features such as compensation, timeouts, exception blocks,
etc... then you won't loose anything by setting the transaction type to
None.  I wouldn't recommend setting it to Atomic because you don't want the
perf hit of Long Running - as this is quite likely to cause even more
performance problems.

If you do require guaranteed consistency across different shapes, automatic
roll-back, the ability to define compensation for completed transactions,
etc... then you may want to try and get more familiar with the functionality
and pros and cons of each transaction type.  They can add a great deal of
value in many situations, and the perf hit can often be minimal.

Regards,

- Bill Ticehurst [MSFT]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

"beewil" <beewil@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A47A9243-BC2A-4C53-83F6-FB30A5D6D590@microsoft.com...
>I can't find any documentation on the transaction type property with in an
> Orchestration that explains what happens when it is set  to NONE.
> Currently
> I have it set to Long Running, but after reading the performance hit with
> this setting I would like to change it.   I took out all of the scopes and
> tried to change it to Atomic, but I receive an errors saying that I can't
> have a send and receive port defined.
>
> What happens if I set the Transaction type to NONE?  Is this a good
> practice?  The orchestration is a real time call to the back end to get
> data.
> There is no reason for retry if it fails and there is code that checks the
> return messages's status for error handling.
> --
> chris wilper







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register