03-09-05 10:57 PM
This NG is dead!! And I know why!
Gave up on Win2003 its crap and doesnt work, glad it was free! Now installed
XP-Pro and using the most amazing freeware www.mailenable.com It is in a
word "blinding" that is blindingly simple but blindingly functional. It took
less than 5 minutes to set up a full blown SMTP/POP solution and a lovely
simple interface.
No pitch, just have a go for yourself and see what can be done. My only
concern with the freeware is that theres no SPA, but then I dont really know
what SPA is. But unlike 2003 it doesnt come relay enabled! And the help file
on relaying isnt a contradiction in terms. In fact I installed it on a
client as an emergency when 2003 completely lost the plot. I just copied the
files over to my new server "ahem XP" and there it all was. None of this
command line crap from MS. Migration twaddle rubbish nonsense.
"JD" <jd@thejd.co.ukSPAM> wrote in message
news:eoEkpV9IFHA.1308@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I recently firmed up the security on a fully functioning mail server: My
>clients and my host are now using SPA and SMTP authentication. (please
>advise if this is best)
>
> Why would my Win2003 SMTP server now queue and not send mail that is
> destined for domains not listed within the POP3 Service? BUT works 100%
> for mail that is!
>
> And lastly another query, in SMTP-Virtual
> Server/Properties/Access/Authentication can I disable Annoymous access and
> simply keep (selected) "Intergrated Windows Authentication"...... Ive
> never really understood this strange contradiction, the annotation refers
> to a "resource" which resource is it reffering to? Relay is dealt with
> elsewhere... so whats it on about?
>
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
