03-14-05 01:47 AM
Hi again.
At some later stage the portal will be connected to TAM (Tivoli Access
Manager = LDAP directory).
Since People Finder is only accessing the database of users at the moment
and the user names are stored in a camel case way (eg. Tony Cooke) does the
search then have case issues whereas an LDAP search may not care?
Has anyone else found this?
All the best,
Tony
"Tony Cooke" <TCooke@elders.com.au> wrote in message
news:d0rbud$4p6s$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
> Hi all.
>
> I was checking the online help for people finder and came across the
> following:
>
> When you enter search text, keep these guidelines in mind:
> a.. Searching is not case-sensitive, so m and M are treated as the same
> letter.
> b.. In most cases, a match is returned if an entry is found that begins
> with the text you entered. For example, the search text ma would find Mary
> or Mary Beth in a first name field.
> If you are unsure of the spelling, enter a person's name correctly as
far
> as you can. For example, if you are unsure whether someone's name is
Patrice
> or Patricia, enter the following string:
>
> Patric
> c.. In a search for a name, several fields are searched in various
> combinations, and you can use a comma to indicate a lastname, firstname
> format. For example, if you enter John Steven, matches include John
Steven,
> John Stevenson, Steven John, Steven Johns, and Steven Johnson. And if you
> enter doe, j matches include Jane Doe and John Doe.
> d.. Hyphenated words are treated as one word.
> e.. Matching is additive. In other words, if you enter search text in
the
> First name field and also in the Last name field, only people who have a
> first name that contains the First name search text and a last name that
> contains the Last name search text are returned.
> Could someone then please tell me why our searches ARE case sensitive?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> All the best,
> Tony
>
> "Tony Cooke" <TCooke@elders.com.au> wrote in message
> news:d0r968$56de$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
solved[vbcol=seagreen]
> disabled
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|